arXiv AI By Javier del Pino (SperidLabs), Salvador Rodr\'iguez (SperidLabs), Alejandro Garabito (SperidLabs), Javier \'Alvarez (SperidLabs), Chema Garabito (SperidLabs)

ENEAS: Embedding-guided Neural Ensemble for Adaptive Segmentation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

ENEAS is a unified, text‑promptable method that simultaneously provides precise instance tracking and high‑quality segmentation, and enables open‑concept discovery of any instance named by a text query. It extends the SeC architecture with a text‑prompting adapter and temporal memory to maintain targets through disappearance and avoid drifting, while a semantic verification layer combines visual embedding matching with conditional VLM refinement to filter ontological errors. Designed for 3D reconstruction, ENEAS delivers robust semantic tracking and segmentation across videos, libraries, and unordered collections, distinguishing true instances from look‑alike doppelgangers.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
4d ago

GoDeep: Annotation-Free Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Understanding via Language-Space Lifting

GoDeep is an annotation‑free method for open‑vocabulary 3D scene understanding that uses a vision‑language model solely as a translator to generate structured, entity‑level descriptions of each image. These descriptions are projected and aggregated in a language‑only embedding space, eliminating the need for a 3D training corpus or domain‑specific encoder. The approach achieves competitive performance on ScanNet++ and a cultural heritage benchmark, accurately localizes out‑of‑vocabulary objects, and offers explainable, point‑level predictions.

By Thodoris Betsas, Anastasios Doulamis, Andreas Georgopoulos
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

Retrieval Heads Meet Vision: Uncovering How VLMs Locate and Extract Visual Information

The paper introduces Visual Retrieval Heads (VRHs), a small fraction of attention heads in vision‑language models that are causally responsible for grounding text descriptions to image regions. By recasting head‑scoring methods and evaluating across eleven VLMs and five benchmarks, the authors show that masking the top 20 VRHs can drop grounding accuracy by up to 80 percentage points, while random masking has little effect. VRHs generalize across various visual reference tasks, preserve output format while corrupting localization, and transfer causally across models sharing an LLM backbone.

By Chanho Park, Daehyeon Choi, Jihyun Lee, Minhyuk Sung