arXiv:2509. 15001v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Child-centered daylong recordings are essential for studying early language development, but existing speech models trained on clean adult data perform poorly due to acoustic and linguistic differences.
By Th\'eo Charlot, Tarek Kunze, Maxime Poli, Alejandrina Cristia, Emmanuel Dupoux, Marvin Lavechin
arXiv:2606. 01134v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatically distinguishing child-directed speech from adult-directed speech in long-form recordings is key to scalable analyses of children's language environments.
By Th\'eo Charlot, Tarek Kunze, Kaveri K. Sheth, Alejandrina Cristia, Marvin Lavechin
arXiv:2610.00825v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Dubbing quality control requires a reference-free judge that can determine whether a candidate text line matches a speaker's visible articulation in bo...
By Rui Liu, Bhavin Jawade, Haoqi Li, Shivam Mehta, Karan Saxena, Yinghong Lan, Cameron R. Wolfe
arXiv:2609.23416v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Long-form audio performance is often summarized by context length and aggregate accuracy, obscuring how language, evidence, and task jointly shape di...
By Zeyu Yang, Xinyu Zhang, Zibo Bi, Pei Zhang, Xize Cheng, Jin Xu, Baosong Yang, Satoshi Nakamura
The paper introduces a synthetic Bengali speech dataset tailored for telecom customer‑care applications, comprising 10,000 audio‑text pairs (≈26.82 hours) with predefined train, validation, and test splits. The data were generated using OmniVoice voice‑cloning, and include both original and normalized transcripts for ASR/STT use. Automatic intelligibility evaluation with a fine‑tuned Whisper model shows an average WER of 2.54% and CER of 0.59%, indicating strong text‑audio consistency, while the authors note limitations of synthetic speech and STT‑based evaluation.
By Kawshik Kumar Paul, Md. Nafiul Alam Fuji
The paper introduces methods to improve speech recognition for multilingual video transcription using Whisper-based tools, targeting cross‑cultural understanding. It reports an average transcription error rate of 30% across seven languages, which can be lowered to 20% with modest fine‑tuning. The authors also release associated speech and metadata to aid community refinement of these techniques.
By Michael Picheny