arXiv Computer Vision

Align Then Reason: A Multimodal Lip-Sync Judge for Dubbing

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

Alignment-Free Text-Audiobox for Voice Dubbing and Full-Duplex Dialogue Synthesis

The paper introduces Alignment-Free Text‑Audiobox (Text‑AB), a unified diffusion‑based framework that performs high‑quality voice dubbing and full‑duplex dialogue synthesis without requiring forced alignment. Text‑AB uses a latent diffusion model with DAC‑VAE features, achieving over 10× compression compared to prior EnCodec representations, and learns text‑speech alignment via cross‑attention. The authors pretrain a 3B‑parameter model on 480k hours of monolingual speech and fine‑tune it for cross‑lingual dubbing, full‑duplex dialogue, and emotional dialogue, reporting significant improvements in prosody, voice similarity, naturalness, and emotional expressivity over existing internal systems.

By Sanyuan Chen, Min-Jae Hwang, Sho Inoue, Anna Sun, Bokai Yu, David Kant, Dongmin Hyun, Dorian Desblancs, Gregory Antonovsky, Oleg Repin, Peng-Jen Chen, Xutai Ma, Zehai Tu, Juan Pino, Wei-Ning Hsu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Enabling automatic transcription of child-centered audio recordings from real-world environments

The paper presents a method to automatically identify utterances in child-centered daylong audio recordings that can be reliably transcribed by modern ASR systems, enabling accurate transcription of a substantial portion of the speech. On four English corpora, the approach achieves a median WER of 0% and a mean WER of 16% when transcribing 30% of the total speech, compared to a median WER of 52% when transcribing all speech. Word frequency distributions from the automatic transcripts correlate strongly with manual annotations (r = 0.94 overall, r = 0.99 for frequent words).

By Daniil Kocharov, Azarias Galama, Okko R\"as\"anen
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Phoneme- and Word-Level Metrics Using Self-Supervised Speech Representations for Forced Alignment Evaluation

The paper introduces two new corpus‑level, reference‑free metrics—Phoneme‑Cluster Mutual Information (PCMI) and Word Acoustic Consistency Score (WACS)—that use self‑supervised speech representations to evaluate forced alignment quality. PCMI quantifies how well aligned phoneme labels agree with clusters derived from SSL representations, while WACS assesses consistency across repeated word realizations via dynamic time warping of word representation sequences. Experiments on 85 languages from FLEURS and 45 languages in DoReCo show that both metrics degrade predictably under alignment perturbations, effectively distinguish high‑ from low‑quality alignments, and correlate strongly with traditional timestamp‑based measures, enabling scalable, multilingual alignment evaluation without manual annotations.

By V. S. D. S. Mahesh Akavarapu, Michael Daniel, Gerhard J\"ager
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

Personalized Korean Lipreading as Visual Speech Recognition: Transfer, Census and Adaptation on OLKAVS

The paper introduces a personalized Korean visual speech recognition system that uses a video-only Conformer model initialized from English-trained weights, achieving a character error rate (CER) of 9.95–12.19% on the OLKAVS nine-camera corpus and 19.00–21.52% on unseen wording. Individual speaker CER varies widely (1.0–52.2%), with seen wording reducing errors by 7.0–9.0 points and professional or spontaneous speech increasing errors by 8.5–12.7 points. A low‑rank adapter, comprising only 4.6% of the model parameters and trained on 4–29 minutes of a user’s frontal video, reduces high‑error speakers’ CER by 2.13–3.58 points, transfers across all cameras without loss, and retains 85% of full fine‑tuning benefits at 12% of its cost; cameras above the mouth plane add a constant offset of about six CER points that can be mitigated by training on all views.

By Se Un Park, Hakjun Kim, Taehoon Roh, Junyoung Park
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

From Visual Cues to Spoken Narration: Rethinking Audio Description

The paper introduces Cue2Narrate, a two‑stage pipeline that jointly predicts what visual events to narrate and when to insert the narration in long, untrimmed movie clips. It uses a dual‑head audio‑visual localizer to identify visual cue and narration windows, followed by a LoRA‑adapted vision‑language model that generates concise audio descriptions, trained with a Description Ranking Loss. The authors also present the LongLSMDC benchmark, comprising up to 8‑minute clips, and show that Cue2Narrate outperforms video‑only and audio‑only baselines by 5–12 points in average mAP and improves AD generation over fine‑tuned base VLMs.

By Akshita Gupta, Aditya Arora, Federico Tombari, Marcus Rohrbach, Anna Rohrbach