arXiv Computer Vision By Guo Niu, Xiongfei Yao, Teng Wang, Nannan Zhu

Efficient Training with Foresight: Multi-Token Auxiliary Supervision for Autoregressive Image Generation

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The paper introduces MTAR, a training framework for autoregressive image generation that enhances performance through multi-token prediction, token-level contrastive regularization, and semantic dropping. These components address sparse supervision, improve representation discriminability, and accelerate training without affecting inference. On ImageNet, MTAR outperforms LlamaGen with lower FID and faster training, achieving comparable results in only a third of the iterations.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 17

FlashAR: Efficient Post-Training Acceleration for Autoregressive Image Generation

FlashAR is a lightweight post‑training adaptation framework that converts a pre‑trained raster‑scan autoregressive image model into a highly parallel generator using two‑way next‑token prediction. It preserves the original training objective by keeping the horizontal head for row‑wise prediction and adding a lightweight vertical head for column‑wise prediction, with a learnable fusion gate to combine the two predictions. A two‑stage adaptation pipeline—first initializing the vertical head from the pre‑trained model and then jointly fine‑tuning—yields up to a 22.9× speedup for 512×512 image generation while using only 0.05% of the original training data.

By Junkang Zhou, Yefei He, Feng Chen, Weijie Wang, Bohan Zhuang
arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago

FeaTok: Feature-Loss Tokenization for Image Generation

FeaTok introduces feature-loss tokenization for image generation, training discrete tokens by reconstructing pretrained features instead of pixels. This approach improves generative performance across multiple self-supervised models (SigLIP, SigLIP2, DINOv2, DINOv3). In class-conditional generation, FeaTok reduces gFDr6 by up to 29% at 256×256 resolution and outperforms the strongest unguided continuous baseline with 38× less sampling compute, while also achieving higher human-preference reward-model scores and surpassing text-conditional baselines after only 500 fine-tuning updates.

By Zhang Xiaofeng, Samuel Lavoie, Nicolas Beltran-Velez, Jianhao Yuan, Felix Friedrich, Jakob Verbeek, Aaron Courville, Michal Drozdzal, Adriana Romero-Soriano
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 8

QuadTok: Quadtree Visual Tokenizer for Autoregressive Image Generation

QuadTok introduces a quadtree-based visual tokenizer that replaces traditional 2D grids or 1D token sequences with a hierarchical structure, allowing dynamic allocation of tokens to visually complex regions while using coarser resolution for homogeneous areas. The tokenizer, trained on ImageNet, reduces token usage by about 10% compared to a fixed 256-token grid and retains comparable reconstruction fidelity. Leveraging the tree’s natural causality, a 947 M GPT-style model conditioned on a quadtree topology achieves a 2.08 gFID on ImageNet 256×256 and supports zero‑shot spatially controlled image generation.

By Yucheng Mao, Zeyuan Chen, Xiaojun Shan, Xiang Zhang, Divyansh Srivastava, Bingnan Li, Zhuowen Tu
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Token Reduction Should Go Beyond Efficiency in Generative Models -- From Vision, Language to Multimodality

arXiv:2505. 18227v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In Transformer architectures, tokens\textemdash discrete units derived from raw data\textemdash are formed by segmenting inputs into fixed-length chunks.

By Zhenglun Kong, Yize Li, Fanhu Zeng, Lei Xin, Shvat Messica, Xue Lin, Pu Zhao, Manolis Kellis, Hao Tang, Marinka Zitnik
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

Studying Image Tokenizers as Visual Languages in Unified Multimodal Models

The paper investigates image tokenizers as the visual language of unified multimodal models by creating a controlled autoregressive testbed that tracks task‑specific validation losses during multimodal continual pretraining across text, image, text‑to‑image, and image‑to‑text predictions. It shows that losses must be analyzed by task, that the loss–performance relationship varies with the token space, and that better reconstruction does not always lead to stronger downstream performance. The study also demonstrates how tokenizer design choices—such as discriminator use, semantic supervision, and vocabulary size—affect joint modeling and downstream results.