arXiv Computation and Language By Howard Kim, Keun Tae Cho

Distributional Validity and Calibration of a Korean Synthetic Persona Panel for Digital and AI Service Use: A Secondary-Data Validation Against the Korea Media Panel Survey

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The study evaluates a Korean synthetic persona panel (NVIDIA Nemotron‑Personas‑Korea) conditioned on Gemini 3.5 Flash and EXAONE against the KISDI Korea Media Panel Survey. Across eight digital‑AI service‑use indicators and eight innovativeness constructs, the panels achieved mean absolute errors of 15–19 pp, with segment‑level errors up to 52.4 pp and correlation coefficients between 0.69 and 0.90. Holdout calibration reduced sex‑by‑age cell errors but still lagged behind direct real‑data estimation, indicating that synthetic panels are useful diagnostically but not as survey substitutes.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

Do Synthetic Personas Predict Real Audience Response? A Sim-to-Real Study Where a No-Persona Baseline Beats Persona-Based Copy Simulation

The study evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) used as synthetic personas can predict real audience responses to marketing copy. Using thousands of headline A/B tests from the Upworthy Research Archive, the authors compare a ten-persona panel grounded in real audience demographics to a no-persona zero‑shot baseline that asks the model for a typical reader’s click likelihood. Results show that the no‑persona baseline outperforms the persona‑based approach, with higher predictive validity and top‑1 accuracy, indicating that forcing the model to role‑play specific personas introduces bias and noise.

By Alexandre Cristov\~ao Maiorano
arXiv AI
Sep 10

A Three-Tier Persona Vector for Controllable User Simulation in Agentic Evaluation

The paper introduces a three-tier persona vector for user simulation in evaluating LLM agents, comprising 23 dimensions across demographics, behavioral traits, and emotional states, plus a query-complexity overlay. It demonstrates that these nuanced personas generate diverse, scenario-reactive conversations, leading to significant variations in agent goal achievement and compliance across different contexts. The model’s design allows for reproducible, auditable user behavior patterns without relying on learned covariance matrices.

By Rahul Khedar, Eshita, Sneha Teja Sree Reddy Thondapu, Mayank Malhotra, Arup Kumar Das, Jitesh Chandra Mishra, Arun Menon, Avinash Karn, Mouli V