arXiv Computation and Language By Fahad Al Hussen (King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), Mohammed Q. Shormani (Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen)

Digital diglossia: Arabic between X and Facebook

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The study examines how Standard Arabic (SA) and Colloquial Arabic (CA) are distributed across X and Facebook by analyzing 10,000 public posts classified into seven discourse categories. Statistical tests reveal significant associations between discourse category and diglossic choice on both platforms, with platform also influencing diglossic choice. Logistic regression shows higher odds of SA use on X in certain domains, indicating that digital platforms reshape but do not erase diglossic boundaries.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 28

Where Does Rhetorical Distortion Live? A Multi-Platform, Multi-Language Measurement of Influencer Content

The study introduces a unified method for measuring rhetorical distortion across six social media platforms and two languages, distinguishing between creator posts and their replies. It identifies five distortion dimensions—Significance Inflation, Anxiety Manufacturing, Novelty Claims, Loaded Language, and Temporal Distortion—using a three‑tier pipeline that combines lexical rules, negative filters, and LLM verification. Results show that distortion is far more strongly linked to the platform than content type, with X/Twitter exhibiting the highest distortion scores, and that the audience layer (replies) carries significantly more distortion than creator posts.

By Xucheng Yu, Jiangping Chen, Haohan Wang