← Back to all news
arXiv Computation and Language By Siddharth Bhargava, Sara Tonelli, Patricia Mart\'in-Rodilla

Designing and Analysing Argument Mining Pipelines: Towards a Comprehensive Assessment

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces a meta‑study that reviews state‑of‑the‑art end‑to‑end argument mining (AM) pipelines. It proposes a triple‑perspective framework—linguistic, computational, and domain—to analyze how these pipelines model, compute, and incorporate domain knowledge into argument structures. The authors also outline a general design for the linguistic and computational aspects, aiming to standardize methodology descriptions and enable clearer comparisons among AM approaches.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

Related stories

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

OpenDebateEvidence: A Massive-Scale Argument Mining and Summarization Dataset

arXiv:2406. 14657v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce OpenDebateEvidence, a comprehensive dataset for argument mining and summarization sourced from the American Competitive Debate community.

By Allen Roush, Yusuf Shabazz, Arvind Balaji, Peter Zhang, Stefano Mezza, Markus Zhang, Sanjay Basu, Sriram Vishwanath, Mehdi Fatemi, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv
llmsnlpfine-tuningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

Extracting Arguments, Not Just Classifying Them: Instruction-Tuned LLMs for Generative Component Detection

arXiv:2609.24855v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Argumentative component detection (ACD) is a core subtask of Argument(ation) Mining (AM) and one of its most challenging aspects, as it requires join...

By Sofiane Elguendouze (UniCA, I3S, MARIANNE), Erwan Hain (UniCA, MARIANNE), Elena Cabrio (MARIANNE, UniCA), Serena Villata (CNRS, MARIANNE)
llmscomputer-visionfine-tuningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

Who Argues What? Joint Argument-Entity Detection and Classification in Political Debates

The paper introduces DNE‑ElecDeb, an enriched version of the USElecDeb dataset that annotates Debate Named Entities (DNEs) in both argumentative and non‑argumentative spans, and defines Debate Named Entity Recognition (DNER) as a new task. It proposes Joint Argument and Entity Tagging (JAET), a generative framework that fine‑tunes decoder‑only LLMs to insert inline argument and entity tags into debate turns while preserving the original transcript. JAET achieves significant improvements in joint AM+DNER performance (+27.3% relative F1 in the untyped setting and +41.9% in the typed setting) over sequential pipelines, and these gains generalize to Persuasive Essays (+26.6% and +52.7%).

By Lucio La Cava, Stefano Francesco Monea, Sergio Greco
llmsnlp
More like this →