arXiv AI By Jakub B\k{a}ba, Jaros{\l}aw Chudziak

CAF-Gen: A Multi-Agent System for Enriching Argumentation Structures

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 06646v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Formalizing complex reasoning from natural text is one of the central challenges in computational linguistics.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

Designing and Analysing Argument Mining Pipelines: Towards a Comprehensive Assessment

The paper introduces a meta‑study that reviews state‑of‑the‑art end‑to‑end argument mining (AM) pipelines. It proposes a triple‑perspective framework—linguistic, computational, and domain—to analyze how these pipelines model, compute, and incorporate domain knowledge into argument structures. The authors also outline a general design for the linguistic and computational aspects, aiming to standardize methodology descriptions and enable clearer comparisons among AM approaches.

By Siddharth Bhargava, Sara Tonelli, Patricia Mart\'in-Rodilla
arXiv AI
6d ago

OmouAI: Argumentative Human-AI Policy Deliberation with Simulated Personas

OmouAI is an interactive deliberation system that combines large language models with computational argumentation to facilitate policy debates involving humans and simulated personas such as stakeholders, experts, or devil’s advocates. Each persona generates its own arguments, which are assembled into a shared argumentation framework that users can contest, add to, or revise, ensuring human oversight. The system evaluates arguments using deterministic argumentative semantics against external goals like the UN Sustainable Development Goals, providing faithful explanations and indicating how policy recommendations affect those goals.

By Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Antonio Rago, William Yeoh, Georgina Curto