Argumentative component detection (ACD) is a core subtask of Argument(ation) Mining (AM) and one of its most challenging aspects, as it requires jointly delimiting argumentative spans and classifying...
arXiv:2609.39225v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Argument structure prediction (ASP) constructs complete argument structures from discourse by identifying argumentative units and their relations. Whil...
The paper introduces a meta‑study that reviews state‑of‑the‑art end‑to‑end argument mining (AM) pipelines. It proposes a triple‑perspective framework—linguistic, computational, and domain—to analyze how these pipelines model, compute, and incorporate domain knowledge into argument structures. The authors also outline a general design for the linguistic and computational aspects, aiming to standardize methodology descriptions and enable clearer comparisons among AM approaches.
The paper proposes Layer-Informed Fine-Tuning (LIFT), a method that identifies and updates only the most functionally critical layers of large language models (LLMs) using a bottleneck identification mechanism based on sensitivity analysis. By focusing on layers that handle conceptualization, reasoning, and textualization, LIFT aims to accelerate training and enhance performance on reasoning tasks. Experiments demonstrate that this selective fine-tuning approach both speeds up the training process and yields significant performance gains.
arXiv:2510. 01427v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: At the core of Deep Research is knowledge mining, the task of extracting structured information from massive unstructured text in response to user instructions.
arXiv:2512. 14332v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The field of Language Reasoning Models (LRMs) has been very active over the past few years with advances in training and inference techniques enabling LRMs to reason longer, and more accurately.
arXiv:2607. 20470v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enhancing the task-specific capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) primarily requires substantial instruction-tuning datasets.
arXiv:2606. 06646v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Formalizing complex reasoning from natural text is one of the central challenges in computational linguistics.
arXiv:2511.23271v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long system prompts are widely used to steer Large Language Models (LLMs), but repeatedly processing them at inference time is inefficient and cons...
arXiv:2605. 27642v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Soft prompting, also known as continuous prompting, is a parameter-efficient method for tuning LLMs to specific tasks.
The paper presents a survey of 129 public large language model (LLM) prompt datasets, totaling over 1.22 TB and 673 million instances, and introduces a unified taxonomy for them. By analyzing seven datasets in depth, the authors identify lexical, syntactic, and semantic patterns that differentiate prompts from general text, and evaluate these patterns for tasks such as prompt filtering, source domain routing, and response quality assessment. They demonstrate that a 63‑dimensional linguistic feature set extracted on a CPU can match over 91 % of the F1 score of GPU‑based sentence embeddings while halving latency, and that structural features can effectively route prompts across datasets, though they may negatively impact response quality when prompt length is controlled.
arXiv:2607. 08399v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models process prompts by propagating activations through dozens of layers before generating a response.