arXiv AI
Dense Clinical Contrasts Enhance Medical Knowledge Updating in Large Language Models
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 30
TRACE: Deployable Tree-Relational Structure Enhancement for Oncology LLMs
TRACE is a deployable framework that enhances oncology language models by separating offline structure learning from online inference. It organizes oncology concepts and relations into an updatable tree‑relational structure, refines it with LM‑loss evidence, and retrieves compact prompt evidence during inference. The approach improves performance on ten classification tasks and a QA benchmark, outperforms vanilla RAG and generic GraphRAG, and provides interpretable evidence paths aligned with clinical reasoning.
arXiv AI
Sep 1
A collective capability boundary in frontier large language models on guideline-conformant and case-specific oncology decision-making
arXiv:2608.28592v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve high scores on medical knowledge examinations, yet real-world oncology is not a knowledge test--it is a sequence o...
arXiv AI
Jul 24
A Knowledge-Injection Framework for Zero-Shot Adaptation of LLMs to Delirium Prediction
arXiv:2607. 20453v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models show promise for clinical prediction, but zero-shot performance on specialized tasks is limited by incomplete domain knowledge, especially for smaller locally deployable models.
arXiv AI
Aug 19
Foundation Agents Meet Agentic Deep Research: Evidence-Grounded Clinical Code Forecasting
The paper introduces ICD-Deepresearch, a workflow that combines foundation models for electronic health records (EHR) and language models with medical search and ICD dictionaries to forecast future ICD codes for upcoming clinical encounters. It evaluates candidate code transitions by linking patient evidence, external clinical relations, and exact code semantics within a fixed top‑K budget, using SparseEHR for initial priors, GPT‑5 for complementary forecasts, and a final selection step that validates, deduplicates, and ranks candidates. The method achieves patient‑averaged precision/recall of 24.60/35.09% on MIMIC‑III and 25.14/48.32% on MIMIC‑IV, with physicians rating 51–68% of its retrieved documents as useful, outperforming standalone GPT‑5 web search and Medical Deep Research.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22
Didactic knowledge or Clinical Cases? How Data Types Shape Medical Large Language Models
arXiv:2609.22161v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical large language models are commonly trained on mixtures of didactic data (e.g., textbooks) and clinical data (e.g., patient records), yet how...
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 1
MedKIT: Evaluating Knowledge Integration and Generalization in Large Language Models
arXiv:2609.38543v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constantly evolving real-world knowledge necessitates models to be updated continuously. Especially in medicine, as clinical evidence changes over time...