arXiv Computer Vision By Keiller Nogueira, Codrut-Andrei Diaconu, D\'avid Kerekes, Jakob Gawlikowski, C\'edric L\'eonard, Nassim Ait Ali Braham, June Moh Goo, Zichao Zeng, Zhipeng Liu, Pallavi Jain, Andrea Nascetti, Ronny H\"ansch

Data-Centric Benchmark for Label Noise Estimation and Ranking in Remote Sensing Binary Building Segmentation

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

Object Detection Benchmarks are Incomplete: The Role of Label Errors and Annotation Uncertainty

The paper demonstrates that object detection benchmarks suffer from incomplete annotations, with re-annotation of COCO, Pascal VOC, Cityscapes, and KITTI revealing up to a 60% increase in detected objects, especially small, occluded, or densely packed instances. The authors propose a scalable annotation pipeline that uses multiple annotators per object to capture uncertainty and improve recall, and they introduce two new large-scale benchmarks: an uncertainty-aware detection benchmark and a label error detection benchmark based on real errors. Their findings show that benchmark performance is highly sensitive to annotation quality, yet model rankings remain largely unchanged, highlighting the need for uncertainty-aware evaluation to better reflect real-world ambiguity.

By Sarina Penquitt, Jonathan Klees, Antonia van Betteray, Parssa Jashnieh, Peter Stehr, Matthias Rottmann, Lars Schmarje
arXiv AI
Aug 20

A Critical Synthesis of Uncertainty Quantification and Foundation Models for Semantic Segmentation

The paper presents the first systematic evaluation of uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods applied to a foundation model for semantic segmentation. By fine‑tuning a lightweight DPT decoder on the pretrained SAM2 encoder, the authors benchmark four UQ approaches—Monte Carlo Dropout, Deep Sub‑Ensemble, Test‑Time Augmentation, and Evidential Deep Learning—across Cityscapes, NYUv2, and two out‑of‑domain settings, comparing segmentation accuracy, calibration, uncertainty quality, and inference time. The results reveal clear trade‑offs between predictive performance, reliability, and computational cost, underscoring both the promise and current limitations of uncertainty‑aware foundation models for real‑world deployment.

By Steven Landgraf, Joceline Hinz, Markus Ulrich
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

DisasterInsight is a building‑centric benchmark designed to evaluate vision‑language models (VLMs) for disaster response. Built on the xBD satellite dataset, it adds OpenStreetMap‑derived functional labels to 134,108 building instances and offers 15 task types, including instance assessment, scene counting, multi‑instance reasoning, and structured report generation. Experiments show that VLMs excel at visible damage detection but struggle with building function, multi‑instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting, and instruction tuning only partially mitigates these gaps.

By Sara Tehrani, Yonghao Xu, Leif Haglund, Amanda Berg, Gulnaz Zhambulova, Michael Felsberg