arXiv AI By Amit Das, Tanmay Shukla, Naofumi Tomita, Faraz Farhadi, Jessica Sin, Ari Hakimi, Chad Vanderbilt, Jie-Fu Chen, Ritesh Kotecha, Weijie Ma, Bing Ren, Saeed Hassanpour

Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning from Histopathology and CT for Automated Renal Cell Carcinoma Grading

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The study introduces RCC-Align, a cross‑modal contrastive learning framework that aligns paired histopathology whole‑slide images and CT scans to enhance noninvasive grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Using patient‑level five‑fold cross‑validation on TCGA and CPTAC cohorts, RCC‑Align achieved an AUC of 0.601 and AUPRC of 0.599 for low‑ versus high‑grade ccRCC classification, outperforming CT‑only baselines and showing stronger WSI‑CT embedding alignment. The approach relies solely on CT at inference, potentially aiding grading when biopsy is unsafe or limited by tumor heterogeneity.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 23

Radiomics--Foundation Fusion for Interpretable RCC Classification: Internal Benchmarking and Exploratory External Transfer

arXiv:2609.26578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate preoperative subtype classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from contrast-enhanced CT remains clinically challenging because clear cell...

By Yuan Liang, Fangyijie Wang, Kathleen M. Curran, Gu\'enol\'e Silvestre, Sourav Bhattacharjee, Abraham Campbell
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Semantic-Guided Multimodal Preprocessing for Vision Transformer-Based Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Grading

The paper introduces a semantic‑guided multimodal preprocessing technique that fuses nuclei classification maps with RGB histopathology images for Vision Transformer‑based grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. By concatenating classification map channels and applying multiplicative modulation, the method achieves a balanced accuracy of 0.916, markedly surpassing an RGB‑only baseline (0.707) and prior max‑voting approaches (0.427). Sensitivity analysis shows the 21‑percentage‑point improvement remains robust under simulated perturbations matching current nuclei classifier error rates, indicating effective use of imperfect nuclear‑level information.

By Fatemeh Javadian, Zhu Chen, Zahra Aminparast, Johannes Stegmaier