arXiv:2606. 20493v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their systematic evaluation biases propagate through the agent network.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 20493v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their strategy preferences -- whether induced by explicit prompts or by shared architectural priors -- propagate through the agent network.
arXiv:2606. 23195v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on memory systems to maintain long-term coherence.
arXiv:2606. 16682v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When AI agents use language models to evaluate their own outputs in a feedback loop, systematic biases emerge.
arXiv:2610.00430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous large language model (LLM) agents increasingly interact in network environments where adversarial content can propagate between agents. Kn...
The paper investigates how a minority of biased agents in a multi‑agent system of large language models (LLMs) can amplify bias through textual interactions. Even a small percentage of persistently extreme agents causes significant opinion shifts among the non‑biased agents, with the effect occurring faster in the Llama 3.2 model than in a classical Friedkin‑Johnsen model. Semantic analysis shows that rhetorical consistency rises with biased exposure and that non‑biased agents adopt the biased vocabulary even when their numerical opinions change only modestly.
arXiv:2603. 03555v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) systems scale, evaluating their emergent coordination dynamics becomes increasingly critical.