arXiv:2606. 20493v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their strategy preferences -- whether induced by explicit prompts or by shared architectural priors -- propagate through the agent network.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 20493v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their systematic evaluation biases propagate through the agent network.
arXiv:2606. 16682v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When AI agents use language models to evaluate their own outputs in a feedback loop, systematic biases emerge.
arXiv:2606. 23195v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on memory systems to maintain long-term coherence.
arXiv:2606. 00914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly act after consuming ranked external information streams such as social feeds, search results, retrieval contexts, and email queues, yet safety evaluations almost always test the model or the user prompt in isolation, never the upstream ranker that decides what the agent reads just before it acts.
arXiv:2607. 12077v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent language-model systems increasingly route local interactions, yet the runtime interaction graph is often treated as an implementation detail.
arXiv:2606. 16682v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When AI agents use language models to evaluate their own outputs in a feedback loop, systematic biases emerge.