arXiv:2606. 20493v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their strategy preferences -- whether induced by explicit prompts or by shared architectural priors -- propagate through the agent network.
arXiv:2606. 20493v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their systematic evaluation biases propagate through the agent network.
arXiv:2606. 16682v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When AI agents use language models to evaluate their own outputs in a feedback loop, systematic biases emerge.
arXiv:2606. 23195v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on memory systems to maintain long-term coherence.
arXiv:2610.00430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous large language model (LLM) agents increasingly interact in network environments where adversarial content can propagate between agents. Kn...
The paper argues that in multi‑turn agentic reinforcement learning, credit assignment should be viewed as a coverage problem rather than a targeting problem. It introduces verifier information density (V_d) as a structural metric, showing that terminal‑state verifiers operate in a low‑V_d regime where targeting fails. Experiments on tau^2‑bench, BFCL, and ToolACE‑2‑8B demonstrate that uniformly distributing reward across all turns outperforms sparse, targeted rewards, and that full chain coverage is necessary for optimal performance.
arXiv:2606. 00914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly act after consuming ranked external information streams such as social feeds, search results, retrieval contexts, and email queues, yet safety evaluations almost always test the model or the user prompt in isolation, never the upstream ranker that decides what the agent reads just before it acts.
arXiv:2607. 12077v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent language-model systems increasingly route local interactions, yet the runtime interaction graph is often treated as an implementation detail.
arXiv:2606. 16682v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When AI agents use language models to evaluate their own outputs in a feedback loop, systematic biases emerge.
arXiv:2607. 01600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are deployed as communicating agents, does inter-agent communication cause outputs to converge?
arXiv:2606. 18264v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Faithful modeling of hateful content propagation on online platforms remains an open problem for moderation research.
arXiv:2606. 31371v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When large language model (LLM) agents adapt their behavior through evaluator feedback, systematic evaluator biases propagate into the agent's learned strategy distribution - a phenomenon termed evaluator preference coupling.
arXiv:2605. 29874v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Do next-generation LLM agents inherit the cooperative biases documented in their predecessors, or does scale and provider diversity reshape equilibrium behaviour in competitive multi-agent settings?