The paper introduces a new authorship attribution model that represents each author with multiple consistent but distinct writing styles, rather than a single style profile. Experiments across four scenarios—audience size, temporal distance, preceding context, and genre norms—show that authors vary significantly in how idiolectic their writing is, and that certain settings yield text that is more informative about authorship. The authors demonstrate that modeling multiple styles per author leads to significant performance improvements over traditional single-style approaches.
By Omkar Yadav, Michael Jiang, Kenan Alkiek, Jian Zhu, David Jurgens
The paper investigates how to adapt large language models to mimic an individual author's style using only a few example abstracts, a task made harder by the formal nature of scientific writing. It proposes three style‑conditioning methods—contrastive activation steering, a network predicting steering vectors, and a hypernetwork predicting LoRA adapters—and finds that while fine‑tuning captures the strongest style signal, it harms fluency; the hypernetwork offers the best balance between style imitation and output quality for both seen and unseen authors. The authors also show that steering can be performed at the author level by contrasting author abstracts against style‑neutral generations for the same content, eliminating the need for a predefined style inventory and outperforming inventory‑based approaches.
whyItMatters":"The study provides practical techniques for author‑style transfer in scientific writing, revealing a trade‑off between style fidelity and fluency and demonstrating that hypernetworks can effectively balance these aspects."
By Leonard Popp, Danni Liu, Supriti Sinhamahapatra, Jan Niehues
The paper introduces a training‑free method for uncovering prompt‑conditional stylistic axes in large language models (LLMs). By repeatedly sampling completions of a single prompt at high temperature and applying Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the pooled hidden activations, the authors automatically label the resulting axes using the extreme (pole) generations. Validation against 245 human‑elicited stylistic annotations shows that, for the Qwen‑3.5‑4B‑Instruct model, the top two axes align with human dimensions with 72.8% precision and 43.6% macro‑recall, and 75.6% of validity ratings confirm the axes’ polar generations, while other models exhibit varying degrees of discoverability.
By Ajit Mallavarapu, Ziwei Gu
AuthorMix is a lightweight, modular framework for authorship style transfer that uses layer‑wise adapter mixing. It trains individual style‑specific LoRA adapters on a small set of high‑resource authors, enabling rapid adaptation to new target styles with only a few examples. The method achieves the highest combined style‑meaning score among baselines, including GPT‑5.1, and improves meaning preservation, as confirmed by human evaluation.
By Sarubi Thillainathan, Ji-Ung Lee, Michael Sullivan, Alexander Koller
Authorship verification (AV) assumes that an author's writing style remains sufficiently stable to distinguish it from that of other writers. In practice, however, this assumption is challenged by dis...
arXiv:2606. 10099v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about misuse such as plagiarism, misinformation, and automated influence operations, motivating the need for robust detectors.
By Rafael Rivera Soto, Barry Chen, Nicholas Andrews