arXiv Machine Learning By Zihan Zhu, Shayan Kiyani, George Pappas. Hamed Hassani

Conformal Risk-Averse Decision Making with Action Conditional Guarantee

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 05551v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable decision making pipelines powered by machine learning models require uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods that come with explicit safety guarantees.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

Calibrating Decision Robustness via Inverse Conformal Risk Control

arXiv:2510. 07750v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Robust optimization safeguards decisions against uncertainty by optimizing against worst-case scenarios, yet their effectiveness hinges on a prespecified robustness level that is often chosen ad hoc, leading to either insufficient protection or overly conservative and costly solutions.

By Wenbin Zhou, Shixiang Zhu
arXiv AI
Aug 19

Quantifying Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: Belief-Dependent Robustness for Safe Sequential Decision Making

The paper introduces RATTL (Risk-Adversarial Total-Reward Learning), a framework that adjusts an agent’s caution based on epistemic uncertainty by using a Bayesian posterior over dynamics and a Wasserstein ambiguity set whose radius depends on that posterior. As evidence accumulates, the radius shrinks, smoothly transitioning the agent’s behavior from worst-case robustness to risk-neutral reward maximization. The authors prove a Safety Sandwich theorem showing RATTL’s value lies between the uninformed robust value and the full-knowledge optimum, and demonstrate the method on a binary-hazard example where the criterion reduces to Conditional Value-at-Risk.

By Deep Kumar Ganguly, Jan Kretinsky
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Conformal Risk-Averse Decision Making with Optimized Certainty Equivalent Risk Control

The paper investigates risk‑averse decision making where an agent chooses actions under uncertainty about the system state, using optimized certainty equivalent (OCE) metrics that encompass mean‑variance risk and CVaR. For known distributions, the optimal policy simplifies to a prediction‑set‑based solution for CVaR, linking it to conformal prediction sets. When distributions are unknown, the authors propose a data‑driven calibration method that employs a synthetic likelihood model and held‑out data to achieve high‑probability OCE risk control, and they demonstrate the method on two wireless beamforming scenarios.

By Amirmohammad Farzaneh, Osvaldo Simeone