← Back to all news
arXiv Computation and Language By Aawez Mansuri, Kush Mehta, Mohammadreza Chavoshi, Jahanzaib Malik, Theodorus Dapamede, Frank Li, Rohan Isaac, Beatrice Brown-Mulry, Chiratidzo Rudado Sanyika, YoungSeok Jeon, Judy W. Gichoya, Ali Emami, Hari Trivedi

Comparison of techniques for fine-tuning open-weight models for entity extraction from radiology reports

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The study evaluates whether a fine‑tuned open‑weight model (Gemma‑3‑12B) can match the performance of GPT‑4o in extracting multi‑label intracranial hemorrhage acuity from non‑contrast head‑CT reports. Using a 2×2 design that varied adaptation strategy (classification head vs. instruction fine‑tuning) and training‑data source (distilled real GPT‑4o labels vs. synthetic GPT‑4o‑generated reports), the distilled instruction‑tuned model achieved macro‑F1 scores comparable to GPT‑4o and surpassed the untuned base model. The key finding is that the source of training data—distilled real reports—was more important than the fine‑tuning method, and that the entire fine‑tuning and inference process fits on a single 24 GB consumer GPU.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

Related stories

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17

Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning in Radiology Reports: A Comparative Evaluation of Tokenizer-Driven Privacy Risks

arXiv:2607. 14205v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables multi-institutional training on clinical text without sharing raw data, but gradient inversion can reconstruct sensitive information from shared model updates.

By Santhosh Parampottupadam, Andres Martinez, Dimitrios Bounias, Sinem Sav, Klaus Maier-Hein, Ralf Floca
llmsnlpsafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jul 8

Harrison.Rad 1.5 Technical Report: A radiology foundation model that can draft reports from images, priors and clinical context

arXiv:2607. 05880v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Imaging demand is growing faster than the radiology workforce can expand, and reporting backlogs cannot be resolved through training and recruitment alone.

By Suneeta Mall, Vladimir Nekrasov, Ashnil Kumar, Sajith Karunasena, Aiden Nibali, Alix Bird, Mateo Diaz Shine, Jarrel Seah
llmsfine-tuningmultimodal
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jun 9

RadOT-Eval: Auditable Structured-Evidence Transport for Radiology Report Evaluation

arXiv:2606. 08769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic evaluation is critical for high-stakes text generation, where errors often involve omitted findings, hallucinated content, polarity reversals, location changes, uncertainty mismatches, and temporal-comparison errors rather than low surface similarity alone.

By Weixin Liu, Juming Xiong, Yang Li, Qingyuan Song, Susannah Rose, Murat Kantarcioglu, Bradley Malin, Zhijun Yin
llms
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

RadPRISM: Schema-stratified radiology-report supervision for concept-disentangled image representations and visual grounding

arXiv:2608. 00147v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language pretraining learns rich medical image representations from radiology reports, but previous model variants commonly operate within a single shared embedding space, so concept-level structure and interpretability must be recovered post hoc, limiting model transparency and, hence, clinical utility.

By Fabian Drexel, Marlene Fritzsche, Era Stambollxhiu, Miriam Kumpf, Lena Schmitzer, Lea Schumann, Jannik Kahmann, Friedrich Puttkammer, Johannes Moll, Jannik L\"ubberstedt, Zeineb Ben Chaaben, Anirudh Narayanan, Cosmin I. Bercea, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Marcus R. Makowski, Daniel Rueckert, Lisa C. Adams, Keno K. Bressem
llmsragmultimodalsafety
More like this →