The paper introduces a distribution‑free certification layer that can be applied to any crash‑severity prediction model without modifying the model itself. It provides guarantees for ordinal outcomes, per‑class validity, transfer of coverage to unobserved severities, and one‑sided certificates under deployment shift, all grounded in a functional of the true data law. The framework is evaluated on 5.2 million Texas records, demonstrating a model‑independent lower bound on set width for vulnerable road users and is released as an open‑source package with theorem‑level tests.
By Amir Rafe, Subasish Das
arXiv:2606. 29054v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) deployed for structured generation (NER, JSON extraction, QA, and classification) lack formal reliability guarantees, and standard heuristic abstention policies miss user-specified risk targets by 7.
By Varun Kotte
arXiv:2608. 07913v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Selective-risk certificates promise that accepted outputs meet a declared error target.
By Sanjeda Akter, Ibne Farabi Shihab, Anuj Sharma
arXiv:2609. 18622v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classifiers can make identical predictions yet require labels to compare their selective performance: confidence ranks weight the same errors differently.
By Tetsuji Kuboyama
arXiv:2606. 29484v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern deepfake detectors are rarely consumed as bare classifiers.
By Md Anas Biswas
The paper introduces a label‑free method called AURCC for selecting the best foundational model for medical image classification when the target domain lacks labels. AURCC uses a pseudo‑label discrepancy computed by the SUDO framework to score models without fine‑tuning. Experiments on chest X‑ray data across three inter‑hospital shifts show that AURCC closely matches the true model ranking, outperforming simple source‑accuracy baselines especially when source data are limited.
By Juan I\~naki Larrea, Lucas Mansilla, Enzo Ferrante