Can Multi-modal (reasoning) LLMs detect document manipulation?
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2607. 23075v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting fake-order fraud at scale remains a critical challenge for large online-to-offline (O2O) service platforms, as existing approaches often rely on expert-designed features, produce black-box decisions, and provide limited interpretability.
arXiv:2506.11635v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Credit card fraud mitigation plays a significant role in modern society. While fraud detection systems are essential, they often struggle to...
arXiv:2609.34211v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In financial fraud detection, rich semantic context can provide important evidence for transaction behavior modeling and fraud reasoning. However,...
arXiv:2609.09696v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly proposed as automated auditors of document quality, yet their reliability as detectors of planted errors is poor...
arXiv:2608. 08009v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fake news increasingly relies on cross-modal image-text forgeries, making transparent and verifiable reasoning chains an urgent need for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation (DGM4).
arXiv:2510. 08948v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Effective e-commerce risk management requires in-depth case investigations to identify emerging fraud patterns in highly adversarial environments.