arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

FINESSE: An Agent-Based Simulator and Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Financial Event Sequences

FINESSE is an agent‑based simulation framework that generates synthetic, structured datasets of multiple interdependent financial event streams, such as transactions, payments, account status changes, and policy interventions. Each stream has its own action space, schema, and variable types, and the streams are coupled through agents’ evolving latent states, allowing temporally rich interactions. The accompanying FINESSE‑Bench dataset supports four tasks—balance forecasting, transaction fraud detection, missed payment prediction, and next event prediction—and baseline results are provided using various time‑series and event‑sequence methods.

By Tyler Farnan, Benjamin Eng, Adam Abate, Xirui Hou, Rizal Fathony, Nam H. Nguyen, Senthil Kumar
arXiv AI
Jul 28

Traceable LLM Reasoning for Fake-Order Fraud Detection

arXiv:2607. 23075v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting fake-order fraud at scale remains a critical challenge for large online-to-offline (O2O) service platforms, as existing approaches often rely on expert-designed features, produce black-box decisions, and provide limited interpretability.

By Siqi You, Bingsong Xu, Zhixian Zheng, Xinjian Peng, Yang Xie, Ying Wang, Jiarong Xu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

TxSum: User-Centered Ethereum Transaction Understanding with Micro-Level Semantic Grounding

TxSum introduces a user-centered approach to understanding Ethereum transactions by providing structured, risk-aware explanations grounded at the token‑flow level. The authors built a dataset of 187 complex transactions with 2,375 token‑flow annotations and transaction‑level summaries, and developed MATEX, a multi‑agent framework that retrieves external knowledge and audits explanations for factual consistency. MATEX outperforms existing baselines, improving user comprehension from 52.9% to 76.5% and increasing malicious‑transaction rejection from 36.0% to 88.0% while keeping false‑rejection rates low.

By Zifan Peng, Jingyi Zheng, Yule Liu, Huaiyu Jia, Qiming Ye, Jingyu Liu, Xufeng Yang, Mingchen Li, Qingyuan Gong, Xuechao Wang, Xinlei He