The paper audits a 366‑day autobiographical book generated by a large language model (LLM) against an independent verification corpus. Using a four‑level rubric, 354 of the 366 days (96.7%) failed verification, with only 12 days containing corroborated scenes and 19 days containing actively contradicted claims. Regenerating the same days with current models yielded 100% verification failure, while grounding the generation in the subject’s own corpus improved the rate to 83.3% but still left substantial residual failure.
By Heather Renze
arXiv:2609.09243v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds a language model in retrieved documents, which reduces hallucination but creates a new attack surface: i...
By Iliano Fasolino
The paper introduces MONOLOGUE, a single‑document poisoning framework that uses logic hijacking to subtly alter Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) outputs without overt contradictions. Instead of directly refuting facts, MONOLOGUE frames updates as authoritative historical corrections, embedding counterfactuals into a grounded narrative. The method refines payloads offline through local multi‑dimensional gated optimization, combining text quality audits with surrogate behavioral verification, and demonstrates superior attack efficacy across multiple benchmarks, retrieval backends, and open‑weight generators.
By Hangyi Zhao, Bonan Zhang, Fusen Guo, Jiaheng Wei, Chao Chen, Tianqing Zhu
The study examines how the rapid turnover of large language models (LLMs) undermines the effectiveness of AI‑detectors used to screen scientific manuscripts. By comparing 4,000 PNAS abstracts rewritten by 23 different LLM versions released between June 2023 and August 2026, the authors show that detectors trained on past versions can fail dramatically at generation boundaries, missing up to 96% of rewrites just after a sharp transition. Even detectors updated to newer versions can overlook rewrites of older models, and a commercial detector missed most rewrites of the newest version while flagging few human‑written abstracts.
By Kazuki Nakajima, Takayuki Mizuno
arXiv:2609.06147v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Ask a language model the same question about the same document twenty times, and it sometimes returns two different answers. We built Probity, a benc...
By Seyed Mosayeb Alam
arXiv:2608. 10216v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent frameworks ship quality gates that compare text blocks by embedding-cosine similarity and decide at a fixed cutoff.
By Scott E. Frias
arXiv:2508.11021v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Document fraud poses a significant threat to industries reliant on secure and verifiable documentation, necessitating robust detection mechan...
By Zisheng Liang, Kidus Zewde, Rudra Pratap Singh, Disha Patil, Zexi Chen, Jiayu Xue, Yao Yao, Yifei Chen, Qinzhe Liu, Simiao Ren
arXiv:2608.29307v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Language models increasingly answer questions by consulting retrieved documents rather than memory alone, a design now common in search assistants an...
By Sai Krishna Reddy Mulakkayala, Niki van Stein, Aske Plaat
arXiv:2610.17719v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agents build knowledge graphs as memory, and building them has become easy. Maintaining them has not. When a source is retracted, overruled, or erased,...
By Vishisht Choudhary
INDRA is a research platform that integrates multiple archival collections—such as UCSF’s Industry Documents Library, Columbia and CUNY’s ToxicDocs, and Stanford’s SRITA—into a single, LLM‑readable corpus. It employs three safeguards: a closed evidentiary sandbox, real‑time provenance tagging, and a deterministic system‑level protocol to ensure that model outputs are clearly distinguished from archival evidence and from the model’s own inferences. The platform enables large‑language‑model‑powered investigations across these archives while keeping the conditions of knowledge production transparent and auditable.
By Daniel Akselrad, Robert N. Proctor
arXiv:2608. 16003v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated checking pipelines increasingly place one language model as the checker and another (or the same one) as the fixer.
By Parsa Mazaheri, Kasra Mazaheri
arXiv:2609.00470v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds large language models in external corpora, but implicit trust in retrieved documents creates a critical at...
By Muhaimin Bin Munir, Akib Jawad Ononto, Nazia Shehnaz Joynab, Bhavani Thuraisingham, Latifur Khan