arXiv AI By Dianye Huang, Jiamei Guo, Yue Zhou, Mingde Li, Yi Xiong, Wei Wang, Nassir Navab, Zhongliang Jiang

Beyond Discrete Tokens: Preserving Numerical Continuity in Medical Vision-Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces HAD‑VLM, a hybrid autoregressive‑diffusion vision‑language model that jointly generates text prompts and predicts continuous ultrasound measurements. By tuning the vision encoder with visual prompts and employing a diffusion process to output caliper coordinates and lengths, the model achieves lower mean absolute errors on four echocardiographic tasks compared to autoregressive and fine‑tuned baselines. It also maintains medical question‑answering performance and improves vertebral measurement accuracy on X‑ray data.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

CARE-X: Towards Clinically Useful Radiology VLMs with Auxiliary Supervision, Reward-Aligned Learning, and Tool-Augmented Measurement

arXiv:2608. 03890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A clinically useful chest X-ray system must go beyond fluent report generation: it should classify findings with tunable decision thresholds, localize them spatially, and derive the anatomical measurements upon which many diagnoses depend.

By Mercy Prasanna Ranjit, Anirban Porya, Sathvik Joel, Niharika Vadlamudi, Nikhilesh Chowdary Eathamukkala, Prasanth V V, Abhyuday Kumara Swamy, Pranay Narhari Umredkar, Pradeep Narayan, Vivek Rajagopal, Tanuja Ganu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

Just how sure are you? Improving Verbalized Uncertainty Calibration in Medical VQA

arXiv:2606. 27023v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) applied to Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) tend to produce overconfident outputs regardless of actual correctness, and existing verbalized confidence calibration methods, developed primarily for text only LLMs, do not account for the multimodal nature of medical image understanding.

By Eren Senoglu, Federico Toschi, Nicolo Brunello, Andrea Sassella, Mark James Carman
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

MVC-Bench: Benchmarking Calibration of Medical Vision-Language Models

MVC-Bench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate the calibration of vision‑language models (VLMs) and medical VLMs (Medical‑VLMs) for medical image classification. It tests calibration across robustness to modality, backbone, and domain shift; effectiveness of calibration strategies and prompt‑tuning methods; and stability under prompt‑template and random‑seed variations. The benchmark includes eight backbones, three medical modalities (fundus imaging, histopathology, chest X‑ray), and compares post‑hoc, train‑time, and zero‑shot calibration approaches, reporting accuracy, Expected Calibration Error (ECE), Maximum Calibration Error (MCE), and Adaptive Calibration Error (ACE) over 1,638 experiments, while also proposing a Multi‑Class Margin (MCM) regularization technique that improves ECE in most settings.

By Ashshak Sharifdeen, Shihab Aaqil Ahamed, Ufaq Khan, Muhammad Akhtar Munir Sujair Ibrahim, Mohamed Rafeek Mareer Ahamed, Yutong Xie, Imran Razzak, Muhammad Haris Khan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27

MVC-Bench: Benchmarking Calibration of Medical Vision-Language Models

MVC-Bench is a calibration-focused benchmark for medical vision‑language models, evaluating how well these models express confidence across different modalities, backbones, and domain shifts. It tests robustness to modality, backbone, and domain changes, the effectiveness of calibration and prompt‑tuning strategies, and stability under prompt‑template and random‑seed variations. The benchmark includes 1638 experiments, reporting accuracy and Expected Calibration Error (ECE) along with other calibration metrics, and introduces a simple train‑time calibration method, Multi‑Class Margin (MCM) regularization, that achieves the lowest ECE in most settings.