arXiv Machine Learning By Eren Senoglu, Federico Toschi, Nicolo Brunello, Andrea Sassella, Mark James Carman

Just how sure are you? Improving Verbalized Uncertainty Calibration in Medical VQA

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 27023v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) applied to Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) tend to produce overconfident outputs regardless of actual correctness, and existing verbalized confidence calibration methods, developed primarily for text only LLMs, do not account for the multimodal nature of medical image understanding.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 12

Analyzing and Improving Fine-grained Preference Optimization in Medical LVLMs

arXiv:2606. 12590v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved strong performance across medical imaging tasks, yet they remain prone to factual inconsistencies, poor visual grounding, and misalignment with clinically meaningful feedback.

By Shayan Mohammadizadehsamakosh, Pritam Sarkar, Leonid Sigal, Ali Etemad, Elham Dolatabadi
arXiv AI
Aug 7

DistMedVL: Distributional Vision-Language Alignment for Uncertainty-Aware Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv:2608. 05683v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cross-modal alignment of visual and textual representations is fundamental to multimodal medical image understanding, yet remains hindered by uncertainty in both modalities under real-world clinical conditions.

By Jiaxuan Li, Qing Xu, Xiangjian He, Yue Li, Daokun Zhang, Fiseha B. Tesema, Rong Qu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 14

Mitigating Visual Hallucinations in Multimodal Systems through Retrieval-Augmented Reliability-Aware Inference

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in vision-language understanding and natural-language response generation. However, these systems can still produce overconfident predictions and hallucination-like outputs, particularly when the visual evidence is weak, ambiguous, or semantically inconsistent.