arXiv Machine Learning

Is Monte Carlo Tree Search Just Every-Visit Monte Carlo Control?

The article argues that Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and every‑visit Monte Carlo (MC) control are essentially the same method, differing only in terminology and presentation. It shows that MCTS’s four stages—selection, expansion, simulation, and backup—can be reduced to two core operations: sampling trajectories under the current policy and performing every‑visit MC updates. The note aims to make this equivalence explicit and easier to recognize.

arXiv AI
Jul 20

Process Reward Informed Tree Rollout for Effective Multi-Turn RL

arXiv:2607. 15610v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key approach for training LLM agents, yet popular methods such as GRPO/RLOO rely on multiple independently sampled complete trajectories for advantage estimation.

By Xintong Li, Sha Li, Yuwei Zhang, Changlong Yu, Rongmei Lin, Hongye Jin, Shuyi Guan, Xin Liu, Linwei Li, Qingyu Yin, Jingbo Shang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

PMCTS: Principled Parallelized Inference Time Scaling with Particle Monte Carlo Tree Search

The paper introduces Particle MCTS (PMCTS), a parallelized version of Monte Carlo Tree Search designed for GPU acceleration and batch-parallel neural network evaluations. PMCTS preserves policy improvement guarantees of modern MCTS algorithms while scaling efficiently with parallel compute. Empirical results show that PMCTS consistently outperforms or matches heuristic-based baselines across various MCTS and reinforcement learning domains, including chess, Go, and both discrete and continuous control benchmarks.

By Yaniv Oren, Viliam Vadocz, Joery A. de Vries, Wendelin B\"ohmer, Matthijs T. J. Spaan, Hendrik Baier
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

When LLM Meets Tree Search: A Systematic View of Inference as Search in Large Language Models

arXiv:2608.30395v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As pretraining scaling laws approach saturation, Test-Time Scaling (TTS) has emerged as an important direction for improving reasoning by allocating in...

By Jiaqi Wei, Xiang Zhang, Yuejin Yang, Wenxuan Huang, Juntai Cao, Sheng Xu, Xiang Zhuang, Zhangyang Gao, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Laks VS Lakshmanan, Chenyu You, Wanli Ouyang, Siqi Sun
arXiv AI
1d ago

Learning-Guided Planning in Large Dynamic Action Spaces: Budgeted Tree Search for One-to-Many Mobile Charging

The paper introduces LP‑BTS, a learning‑guided planning framework for mobile charging in large, dynamic action spaces. It uses a graph proposal policy to narrow candidate stops, a value critic to evaluate leaf nodes, and edge‑budgeted PUCT to compare short simulated futures before action selection. Experiments on a 30‑scenario battery‑life benchmark show LP‑BTS achieving the highest survival and alive‑AUC, outperforming domain‑engineered baselines and heuristic policies.

By Liang-Ching Tao, Pi-Chung Wang