A Controlled Evaluation of Model Rankings and Input Reliance in Surface Water Segmentation
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Performance evaluation for surface-water segmentation commonly uses an aggregate metric such as global intersection-over-union (IoU) to rank model configurations. However, a configuration ranking does...
The paper presents a method for distilling a large 300‑million‑parameter geospatial foundation model (Prithvi‑EO‑2.0) into a compact 0.7‑million‑parameter EfficientViT‑B0 student for flood segmentation. By using the teacher to supervise additional unlabeled Sentinel‑2 imagery, the student’s training set expands without new manual labels, achieving competitive performance on Sen1Floods11 and STURM‑Flood while remaining smaller and faster. After quantization, the student runs as a 1.5‑MB INT8 TensorRT engine on a Jetson Xavier NX, processing 512×512 images in 5.57 ms with ~14 MB of memory.
arXiv:2607. 18504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmarks for Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) increasingly rank models by aggregate score, but such rankings obscure why models differ: how much of the gap is architecture, how much is decoder capacity, and how much is a use-case-specific artefact?
arXiv:2606. 20502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Whether LLMs scoring well on vulnerability benchmarks genuinely reason about security or merely pattern-match on contaminated data remains unresolved.
arXiv:2609.01244v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every supervised fine-tuning run forces the same chain of decisions, such as learning rate, batch size, LoRA or full fine-tuning, how many epochs, whic...
arXiv:2607. 18700v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The FathomNetCLEF 2026 competition combines underwater object detection and fine-grained marine species classification under a positive-unlabeled evaluation setting.