arXiv AI
A Comprehensive View of Fairness through Distributional Stability
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 17
No-Free-Fairness: Fundamental Limits and Trade-offs in Learning Systems
arXiv:2606. 17810v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we establish a set of theoretical impossibility results, termed the No-Free-Fairness theorems, that identify three fundamental sources of disparity in learning systems.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Fair Finetuning Mitigates Distribution Inference Attacks
arXiv:2606. 01719v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models trained on sensitive data can inadvertently leak population-level information about their training distributions -- a threat known as distribution inference attack (DIA).
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14
Fairness Constraints in High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Models
arXiv:2604. 16610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning models often inherit biases from historical data, raising critical concerns about fairness and accountability.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2
FedCF: Fair Federated Conformal Prediction
arXiv:2509. 22907v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conformal Prediction (CP) is a widely used technique for quantifying uncertainty in machine learning models.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17
Maximin Relative Improvement: Fair Learning as a Bargaining Problem
arXiv:2602. 04155v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: When deploying a single predictor across multiple subpopulations, we propose a fundamentally different approach: interpreting group fairness as a bargaining problem among subpopulations.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2
Beyond Procedure: Substantive Fairness in Conformal Prediction
arXiv:2602. 16794v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) offers distribution-free uncertainty quantification for machine learning models, yet its interplay with fairness in downstream decision-making remains underexplored.