Divergent Response Modes in Frontier Language Models Under Steering Pressure
arXiv:2608. 06578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier language models are trained using distinct data, objectives, and safety pipelines.
The paper introduces activation probes—directions in a language model’s residual stream—that can both detect and steer safety‑relevant behaviors such as deception, high‑stakes awareness, and sycophancy. By evaluating different estimators (difference‑of‑means vs. logistic regression) and token‑pooling schemes (last, mean, learned attention) on Llama‑3.1‑8B‑Instruct, the authors find that logistic regression excels at detection while difference‑of‑means excels at steering, except for sycophancy where the pattern reverses. The study highlights that the optimal pooling method, layer choice, and steering metric vary by behavior and data, and provides exported probes that enable an interactive interface for scoring and steering text.
arXiv:2608. 06578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier language models are trained using distinct data, objectives, and safety pipelines.
arXiv:2610.07774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) face compositional safety risks where harmful intent emerges from the interaction between visual and textual inputs. As m...
arXiv:2607. 29062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model capabilities have improved in large part due to scaling chain of thought.
arXiv:2607. 25907v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation steering controls model behavior by editing internal activations at inference time.
arXiv:2608.21766v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Both capability and safety benchmarks rest upon the assumption that the behavior of language models undergoing a test is informative about their beha...
arXiv:2606.08682v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Activation steering (AS) has emerged as a popular inference-time technique for modulating the behavior of large language models (LLMs). AS modulate...
arXiv:2606. 08682v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation steering has emerged as a popular inference-time technique for modulating the behavior of large language models (LLMs).
arXiv:2606. 12747v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety-relevant studies of language models, including alignment and jailbreaking evaluations and AI control protocols, often rely on prefilling model outputs.
The paper investigates how safety‑aligned large language models (LLMs) can still be tricked by jailbreaks or over‑refuse benign requests. By analyzing residual‑stream updates in decoder‑only Transformers, the authors find that harmfulness is more readily decoded from attention updates—especially in early layers—while the MLP component is primarily responsible for writing refusal responses. Post‑training enhances MLP‑driven refusal writing without improving harmfulness decodability, and causal interventions confirm that downstream MLP updates are crucial for the refusal shift caused by upstream attention changes. Building on these insights, the authors propose Sentinel, a system that combines an attention‑derived perception score with an MLP‑derived decision score to better detect jailbreaks and over‑refusals across multiple models.
arXiv:2610.20179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probes on activation vectors are widely used to detect misbehavior in language models, but their success relies on the assumption that models cannot...
arXiv:2608. 05624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sycophantic responses are becoming pervasive in large language models (LLMs), and prior work has pointed out that some of them could be harmful.
arXiv:2605. 23055v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Frontier language models sometimes recognize that they are being evaluated and adjust their behavior, undermining validity of benchmark results.