arXiv Machine Learning

How Many Trees in a Random Forest? A Revisited Approach with Plateau Search and Optuna Integration

arXiv:2606. 03549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) for Random Forest faces a specific difficulty in tuning the number of trees: the predictive score typically improves monotonically with ensemble size, so standard methods such as Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) and Hyperband require a predefined search range and often drive the estimate toward its right boundary.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 2

How Many Trees in a Random Forest? A Revisited Approach with Plateau Search and Optuna Integration

Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) for Random Forest faces a specific difficulty in tuning the number of trees: the predictive score typically improves monotonically with ensemble size, so standard methods such as Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) and Hyperband require a predefined search range and often drive the estimate toward its right boundary. Early-stopping strategies avoid fixing such a range, but can be sensitive to score noise and prone to premature stopping.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3

Conditional Inference Trees and Forests for Feature Selection

arXiv:2607. 01417v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conditional inference trees (CIT) and conditional inference forests (CIF) reduce split-selection bias by testing features before choosing split thresholds, but repeated permutation tests and threshold searches can make these methods computationally expensive.

By Robert Milletich, Justin Downes, Steve Goley, Newel Hirst
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

Improving the Predictive Performance of Bootstrap Aggregating by Dirichlet Resampling

The paper revisits Breiman’s insight that lowering inter‑tree correlation can boost random forest performance. It introduces two new variants—Dirichlet‑Multinomial Bagging Random Forest (DM) and Dirichlet‑Weighted Random Forest (DW)—which adjust sample reweighting through a concentration parameter α>0. A theoretical criterion is presented to determine when these methods behave like standard random forests, guiding a lightweight tuning approach. Experiments on public classification benchmarks show DM and DW consistently match or outperform other random‑forest baselines with minimal extra runtime.

By Quoc Viet Le, Joonha Park
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

Vectorized Dynamic Histograms for Sparse Oblique Forests

arXiv:2603.00326v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sparse oblique (SPO), part of the top-ranked configuration of Google's Yggdrasil Decision Forests (YDF), improve the accuracy while maintaining int...

By Ariel Lubonja, Jungsang Yoon, Haoyin Xu, Yue Wan, Yilin Xu, Richard Stotz, Mathieu Guillame-Bert, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Randal Burns
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 7

Optimal or Greedy Decision Trees? Revisiting their Objectives, Tuning, and Performance

arXiv:2409. 12788v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recently there has been a surge of interest in optimal decision tree (ODT) methods that globally optimize accuracy directly, in contrast to traditional approaches that locally optimize an impurity or information metric.

By Jacobus G. M. van der Linden, Dani\"el Vos, Mathijs M. de Weerdt, Sicco Verwer, Emir Demirovi\'c
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 8

Adaptive Conditional Forest Sampling for Spectral Risk Optimisation under Decision-Dependent Uncertainty

arXiv:2603. 12507v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Minimising a spectral risk objective, defined as a weighted combination of expected cost and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), is challenging when the uncertainty distribution is decision-dependent, making both surrogate modelling and simulation-based ranking sensitive to tail estimation error.

By Marcell T. Kurbucz
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Canopy: Exploiting Piecewise Smooth Tree Priors for Multi-Fidelity Bandits

CANOPY is a multi‑fidelity tree bandit algorithm that learns where a piecewise‑smooth prior holds instead of assuming global smoothness. It uses cheap random‑path probes to certify local aggregation bias and then focuses expensive leaf evaluations on cells where smoothness is violated. The method achieves provable fixed‑budget and regret guarantees that scale with the number of discontinuities, matching smooth‑tree rates when no violations exist and approaching structure‑blind search when violations are dense.

By Michael Jerge, Suman Jana