arXiv Computation and Language

Negation Beyond the Verbal Channel: Temporal Multimodal Correlates in Dialogue

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Predicting Turn-Taking Outcomes in Multi-Party Conversation: Interpretable Modelling of Speech and Gaze Dynamics with Interpersonal Closeness

The study investigates how gaze and speech cues, together with perceived interpersonal closeness, predict turn‑taking outcomes in free four‑person conversations. Using the GaMMA corpus, logistic regression models were trained on interpretable features such as gaze transition motifs, entropy, addressee identity, mutual gaze, and speaker loudness to classify floor‑transfer events as gaps or overlaps. Results show that gaze features alone capture predictive structure, and combining them with loudness yields a robust classifier (ROC AUC = 0.76 ± 0.04) that remains effective even under noisy conditions.

By Mark Dourado, Karim Haddad, Henrik G. Hassager, Stefania Serafin
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Using Prosody to Predict Syntactic Structure

arXiv:2608.30260v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While it is well-established that prosody carries crucial cues for syntactic structure, the degree and nature of correspondence between these two dom...

By Junghyun Min, Alex Warstadt, Tamar I. Regev, Tiago Pimentel, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox
arXiv AI
Sep 2

VoiceLongMemEval: Do Assistants Remember How You Sounded?

VoiceLongMemEval (VLME) is a new benchmark that tests AI assistants on their ability to remember how users sounded by incorporating paralinguistic metadata—such as emotion labels, prosody descriptors, and voice events—into each conversational turn. The benchmark uses a three‑stage adversarial gate to ensure that models cannot succeed with transcript alone, revealing a significant affect gap: models gain 0.09 to 0.38 accuracy when provided with paralinguistic cues, and audio‑native models outperform standard ASR pipelines in extracting these signals. The dataset and code will be released upon acceptance.

By Ramit Pahwa, Parivesh Priye, Apoorva Beedu
arXiv AI
Aug 28

When Text Misleads: Inconsistent-Aware Reasoning for Audio-Grounded Dialogue

The paper introduces ContraTalk, a benchmark that tests whether dialogue models truly use acoustic cues or rely on transcript shortcuts. It formalizes cross‑modal disagreement, creates conflict and consistent QA examples, and proposes an Audio Twin representation to expose acoustic evidence to models. Experiments show that while text‑only LLMs perform well on consistent cases, they falter on conflict cases, and AudioLLMs only partially mitigate this issue.

By Yen-Ju Lu, Yuzhe Wang, Yaohan Guan, Xiluo He, Jiarui Hai, Mingrui Liang, Kaavya Chaparala, Thomas Thebaud, Laureano Moro-Velazquez, Najim Dehak, Jesus Villalba