arXiv:2606. 19367v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Building on a two-parameter Weibull framework for diagnosing transformer weight distributions, we study why the Weibull weight-scale parameter $\lambda$ grows, overshoots, and then relaxes during AdamW training.
By Tiexin Ding
arXiv:2610.00423v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Massive activations, residual-stream coordinates with magnitudes far larger than typical activations, are associated with attention sinks in transfor...
By S. Aaron McClendon, Jorge Gallego-Feliciano, Antonios Saravanos
We investigate how each component of the Transformer feedforward block architecture design determines how much rank survives across depth at initialization. We reinterpret skip connections and normalization, long understood as controlling magnitude, as mechanisms for preserving gradient rank across depth, since the very matrix multiplications and nonlinear activations that make the network expressive also reduce the rank.
arXiv:2607. 14018v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate how each component of the Transformer feedforward block architecture design determines how much rank survives across depth at initialization.
By Katie Everett
arXiv:2608. 12447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trained transformer models develop privileged bases: coordinate axes whose statistics differ from the rest of the residual stream.
By Nelson Guda
The paper investigates why the orthogonal optimiser Muon outperforms Adam in large language model pretraining by analysing the spectral properties of Transformer loss landscapes. It finds that Muon’s momentum buffers exhibit an anisotropic spectral profile with a volatile head and a tolerant bulk, enabling larger effective step sizes. Building on this insight, the authors propose Spectral‑Aware Muon (SAMuon) and a lightweight variant, which adjust the bulk scaling while keeping the head unchanged, achieving 13–24 % fewer training tokens than Muon without extra FLOPs.
By Xiaodong Wu, Wenyi Yu, Chao Zhang, Philip Woodland
arXiv:2607. 16821v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Task arithmetic, sequential fine-tuning, activation steering, and first-order random search all operate through relatively small perturbations around an already trained checkpoint, and they rely on different local approximations: individual perturbations should be first-order predictable, task updates should compose with controlled interference, useful tangent structure should be stable and possible to estimate, and weight edits should have counterparts in representation space.
By Irina Piontkovskaia, Sergey Nikolenko
Modern deep networks are trained through long update trajectories, yet their temporal organization remains less systematically characterized than architectures, losses, or optimizers. We study short-h...
arXiv:2608. 15483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern deep networks are trained through long update trajectories, yet their temporal organization remains less systematically characterized than architectures, losses, or optimizers.
By Fanqi Wang, Weisheng Tang, Hairong Qi
arXiv:2602. 22600v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Training selects for behavior, not circuitry: many weight configurations can implement the same function.
By Joshua S. Schiffman
The paper introduces effective depth (Deff), a scalar diagnostic that treats a transformer’s layer‑wise residual stream as a discrete‑time process and measures how representation similarity decays with layer distance. Across sixteen decoder‑only language models, Deff reveals that most models exhibit a lower similarity decay than the closed‑form reference, indicating correlated residual updates rather than unused depth. The study also shows that this effect is robust to various controls and persists early in training, suggesting Deff is a global accumulated‑state diagnostic rather than a capability score.
By Barak Gahtan, Ido Galil, Alex M. Bronstein
arXiv:2606. 31963v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern LLM workflows move coordinate-indexed objects across checkpoints: steering vectors, sparse autoencoders, top-$k$ neuron sets, attribution lists, and merge alignments.
By John Sweeney