arXiv:2607. 06655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this report, we present Pelican-VLA 0.
arXiv:2512. 20014v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models generalize well to generic instructions, they struggle with personalized commands such as "bring my cup," where the robot must act on one specific instance among visually similar objects.
arXiv:2609.38616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable flexible action generation, their generalization across diverse environmental elements, including ma...
Egocentric human data offer a path to scaling robot learning beyond costly robot demonstrations, yet the embodiment gap makes raw human trajectories a poor supervisory target for control. Our key insi...
EgoLAP is a VLA pre‑training framework that learns from both human and robot trajectories by expressing motion intent as temporally abstracted language actions linked to motion‑level reasoning grounded in scene geometry, physics, and object affordances. It jointly trains on a shared language‑based action chain‑of‑thought, enabling the transfer of human experience to robot control. In extensive real‑world and simulated experiments, EgoLAP achieves 80.1% mean real‑world task progress, a 2.3× improvement over alternative action representations, and outperforms composite reasoning formats.
The paper introduces Action–Future Coupled Effect Learning (AFCE), a method that shifts the primary prediction target of vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies from action chunks to future‑grounded physical Effects. AFCE constructs temporally ordered Effect tokens from demonstrations, robot responses, and visual transitions, and uses reconstruction objectives to preserve executable detail and physical change. On the DexJoCo benchmark, AFCE achieves a 50.97% overall success rate, outperforming baseline policies by 11.82 and 15.21 percentage points and excelling on all five bimanual tasks, underscoring the benefit of Effect supervision for coordinated dexterous manipulation.
The paper introduces VLAct, a Vision‑Language‑Action model that focuses on representation‑centric continued pre‑training rather than merely scaling robot data. VLAct is trained on diverse, multi‑embodiment robot data and preserves a broad VLM prior while encouraging shared action semantics across embodiments. Experiments across simulation, real‑world, and unseen‑embodiment settings show that VLAct consistently outperforms existing industrial VLA systems, achieving high success rates with only a modest compute budget and open‑source data.
arXiv:2605. 22183v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for generalist robotic manipulation.
arXiv:2603. 06001v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to perform manipulation tasks directly from natural language instructions and are increasingly viewed as a foundation for generalist robotic policies.
arXiv:2610.09718v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models acquire broad manipulation capabilities via large-scale pretraining, yet eliciting them through language requires...
arXiv:2609.25558v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action policies benefit from geometric supervision, but current-frame geometry alone does not explicitly describe the changes associa...
arXiv:2606. 12299v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control, but the mapping from language to behavior is often brittle and unintuitive: semantically similar instructions can induce drastically different behaviors, while some capabilities may not be elicitable through prompting alone.
arXiv:2610.08133v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong robotic manipulation performance but incur high computational costs from processing long token seq...