arXiv:2606. 23872v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative models increasingly produce samples that are indistinguishable from human-created content, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given data point was part of a model's natural training set or was generated by the model itself, especially when models memorize and reproduce training data.
arXiv:2601. 22651v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Training-data attribution for vision generative models aims to identify which training data influenced a given output.
arXiv:2607. 04339v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large generative models across text-to-text, text-to-image, and image-to-text modalities have been shown to pose significant privacy risks.
arXiv:2512.17730v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Detectors of AI-generated images tend to inherit the biases of the data they are trained on: models fitted to GAN imagery learn to treat GAN-specif...
arXiv:2608. 00716v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robust detection of generated images is critical to counter the misuse of generative models.
arXiv:2606. 31991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement.
arXiv:2606. 26257v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How much of my data was used to train a machine learning model?
arXiv:2606. 07271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding what generative models retain from training data remains challenging, with implications for copyright and privacy.
The rapid proliferation of generative models raises the model attribution problem: given only an image, can we determine which model produced it? Existing methods have grown as elaborate as the genera...
arXiv:2606. 07271v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding memorization in generative models remains challenging, with implications for copyright and privacy.
arXiv:2607. 27372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The deep learning revolution, kicked off by AlexNet, taught us that end-to-end training beats decomposing a problem into hand-designed stages.
arXiv:2607. 13541v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To overcome data scarcity and privacy constraints in data collection, it has become standard practice across academia and industry to augment real training data with text-to-image (T2I)-generated synthetic data, a paradigm we term Real-Synthetic Mix-Training (RSMT).
Generative Verification introduces an active learning strategy for object detection that uses an independent generative model to re‑derive a detection’s label from the pixels inside its predicted box. The disagreement between the detector’s label and the verifier’s label serves as the acquisition signal, automatically combining localization and classification errors into a single scalar and eliminating the need for hand‑weighted terms. Experiments on PASCAL VOC and MS‑COCO show that this signal outperforms traditional uncertainty and ensemble criteria, improving mAP50 by about one point per round, especially in early rounds where confident detector errors are most common.