arXiv:2606. 07271v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding memorization in generative models remains challenging, with implications for copyright and privacy.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 07271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding what generative models retain from training data remains challenging, with implications for copyright and privacy.
arXiv:2606. 31991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement.
arXiv:2606. 23872v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative models increasingly produce samples that are indistinguishable from human-created content, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given data point was part of a model's natural training set or was generated by the model itself, especially when models memorize and reproduce training data.
arXiv:2601. 21628v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models have achieved remarkable progress in image generation, but their increasing deployment raises serious concerns about privacy and copyright.
arXiv:2603. 13421v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative models based on the Flow Matching objective, particularly Rectified Flow, have emerged as a dominant paradigm for efficient, high-fidelity image synthesis.
arXiv:2607. 13541v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To overcome data scarcity and privacy constraints in data collection, it has become standard practice across academia and industry to augment real training data with text-to-image (T2I)-generated synthetic data, a paradigm we term Real-Synthetic Mix-Training (RSMT).