arXiv:2606. 07271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding what generative models retain from training data remains challenging, with implications for copyright and privacy.
By Thomas Sesmat, Gabriel Meseguer-Brocal, Geoffroy Peeters
arXiv:2606. 31991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement.
By Wojciech {\L}apacz, Stanis{\l}aw Pawlak
arXiv:2606. 23872v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative models increasingly produce samples that are indistinguishable from human-created content, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given data point was part of a model's natural training set or was generated by the model itself, especially when models memorize and reproduce training data.
By Bihe Zhao, Michel Meintz, Juangui Xu, Franziska Boenisch, Adam Dziedzic
arXiv:2601. 21628v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models have achieved remarkable progress in image generation, but their increasing deployment raises serious concerns about privacy and copyright.
By Puwei Lian, Yujun Cai, Songze Li, Bingkun Bao
arXiv:2603. 13421v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative models based on the Flow Matching objective, particularly Rectified Flow, have emerged as a dominant paradigm for efficient, high-fidelity image synthesis.
By Mingxing Rao, Daniel Moyer
arXiv:2607. 13541v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To overcome data scarcity and privacy constraints in data collection, it has become standard practice across academia and industry to augment real training data with text-to-image (T2I)-generated synthetic data, a paradigm we term Real-Synthetic Mix-Training (RSMT).
By Na Li, Boyu Kuang, Hongsheng Hu, Liquan Chen, Hyoungshick Kim, Yansong Gao, Anmin Fu
The paper addresses the challenge of calibrating membership inference attacks in a one‑round setting where only a single trained model is available. It proposes using neighboring data points of the target to approximate the calibration that reference models normally provide, and demonstrates that querying these neighbors—especially against early training checkpoints—enhances the membership signal. Experiments on three image classification datasets and training setups show that this neighbor‑based approach yields strong attack performance without extra training cost.
By Francesco Rita, Jie Zhang, Florian Tram\`er
arXiv:2607. 04339v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large generative models across text-to-text, text-to-image, and image-to-text modalities have been shown to pose significant privacy risks.
By Dayong Ye, Tainqing Zhu, Kun Gao, Junhao Liu, Yichuan Chen, Shuai Zhou, Hengzhu Liu, Bo Liu, Wanlei Zhou
arXiv:2603. 17019v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A central question in the debate over large language models is whether transformers can learn rules they have never seen, or whether they can only interpolate: predict new cases from their similarity to training examples.
By Andy Gray
arXiv:2506. 20893v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In this paper, we reveal a significant shortcoming in class unlearning evaluations: overlooking the underlying class geometry can cause information leakage about the forgotten class.
By Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Yian Wang, Hari Sundaram
arXiv:2510. 10982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent AI regulations increasingly emphasize the need for mechanisms that preserve the utility of data for AI innovation while preventing misuse, particularly by enforcing purpose limitation in downstream AI applications.
By Zihan Wang, Zhiyong Ma, Zhongkui Ma, Shuofeng Liu, Akide Liu, Derui Wang, Minhui Xue, Guangdong Bai
arXiv:2603.18908v5 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Independently trained language models often learn compatible late-stage representations, despite differences in training objectives, architectures,...
By Matt Gorbett, Suman Jana