arXiv:2606. 07271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding what generative models retain from training data remains challenging, with implications for copyright and privacy.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 07271v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding memorization in generative models remains challenging, with implications for copyright and privacy.
arXiv:2606. 23872v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative models increasingly produce samples that are indistinguishable from human-created content, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given data point was part of a model's natural training set or was generated by the model itself, especially when models memorize and reproduce training data.
arXiv:2601. 21628v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models have achieved remarkable progress in image generation, but their increasing deployment raises serious concerns about privacy and copyright.
arXiv:2606. 31991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement.
arXiv:2607. 04339v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large generative models across text-to-text, text-to-image, and image-to-text modalities have been shown to pose significant privacy risks.
arXiv:2607. 13541v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To overcome data scarcity and privacy constraints in data collection, it has become standard practice across academia and industry to augment real training data with text-to-image (T2I)-generated synthetic data, a paradigm we term Real-Synthetic Mix-Training (RSMT).