arXiv:2606. 09396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is an efficient approach for downstream task adaptation and often serves as the initialization stage for reinforcement learning (RL), but it can show weaker generalization than RL.
By Ke Wang, Shuangqi Li, Mathieu Salzmann, Pascal Frossard
The paper introduces CIG‑SFT, a supervised fine‑tuning method that uses conditional information gain to evaluate how much each demonstrated token reduces uncertainty about the task. By comparing token likelihoods from a frozen reference model with and without task input, the method derives a KL‑regularized projection of the current policy, yielding a scalar‑weighted SFT objective whose gradients match the projected target. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code‑generation benchmarks show that CIG‑SFT outperforms standard SFT and adaptive fine‑tuning baselines, especially in generalizing to challenging evaluation distributions, without requiring extra data or online rollouts.
By Yuxuan Gu, Kequan Niu, Xiaocheng Feng, Yun Li, Yiqiao Yang, Bing Qin
arXiv:2606. 11189v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) typically maximizes the likelihood of every token in a demonstrated trajectory.
By Tong Xie, Yuanhao Ban, Yunqi Hong, Sohyun An, Yihang Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh
arXiv:2607. 11505v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Post-training for large language models typically couples policy exploration with model optimization, hindering the reuse of high-reward behaviors from policy exploration.
By Daocheng Fu, Rong Wu, Yu Yang, Jianbiao Mei, Licheng Wen, Pinlong Cai, Xuemeng Yang, Yong Liu, Botian Shi, Yu Qiao
arXiv:2606. 09932v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become a standard pipeline for Large Language Model (LLM) post-training.
By Runze Liu, Jiashun Liu, Xu Wan, Yuqian Fu, Ling Pan
arXiv:2609.36659v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The strong generalization performance of on-policy post-training paradigms has motivated studies of their parameter update behaviors. However, these st...
By Shufan Shen, Zhongni Hou, Junshu Sun, Yufei Zhang, Wei Lin, Guojun Yin, Qingming Huang, Shuhui Wang
The paper introduces a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithm that transforms off‑policy traces into more on‑policy data for supervised finetuning (SFT). By tailoring the data distribution rather than changing the learning objective, the method allows SFT to match or surpass traditional post‑training techniques such as reinforcement learning across tasks like scientific skill acquisition, mathematical reasoning, and open‑ended expertise. The resulting models generalize better, forget less, and exhibit strong distributional performance, demonstrating that sampling can serve as a model‑native operator for broader post‑training applications.
By Aayush Karan, Sitan Chen, Yilun Du
arXiv:2607. 04733v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is the standard approach for adapting pretrained language models to downstream domains, yet it often improves target-domain behavior at the cost of degrading pre-existing capabilities.
By Yueyang Wang, Baolong Bi, Shuo Lu, Jingyuan Zhang
arXiv:2610.09665v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: On-policy post-training can improve large language models by learning from their own trajectories, but requires costly rollout generation. We ask wheth...
By Tianle Wang, Jiayu Liu, Ruizhi Zhao, Ning Miao
The paper reports that in on‑policy distillation for large language models, reasoning performance can be improved by supervising only a tiny fraction of generated tokens—sometimes just one or two tokens per reasoning trajectory, about 0.05% of all tokens. This sparse supervision consistently matches or exceeds full‑token training across nine teacher‑student setups on mathematical reasoning, and is also validated on coding reasoning, Llama models, and PPO‑based reinforcement learning with verifiable reward. The findings suggest that effective post‑training does not require token‑intensive supervision and may align more closely with natural learning processes that focus on critical reasoning steps.
By Zhishuai Liu, Xingzi Xu, Mehmet Saygin Seyfioglu, Pan Xu, Karim Bouyarmane
The paper investigates when in‑context learning (ICL) can succeed even if the instruction or target task is not covered by a model’s pretraining data. It introduces a theoretical framework that distinguishes two types of distribution shift—unsupported instructions and unsupported target tasks—and shows how demonstrations can mitigate these shifts. The authors further extend the analysis to long‑horizon tasks that can be decomposed into pretraining‑supported subtasks, providing error bounds that explain how ICL can handle tasks beyond the model’s original support.
By Xuhan Tong, Yuchen Zeng, Jiawei Zhang
arXiv:2606. 11206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is the predominant paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs), yet it suffers from optimization instability and limited generalization.
By Yucheng Zhou, Junwei Sheng, Qianning Wang, Jianbing Shen