arXiv:2606. 09396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is an efficient approach for downstream task adaptation and often serves as the initialization stage for reinforcement learning (RL), but it can show weaker generalization than RL.
By Ke Wang, Shuangqi Li, Mathieu Salzmann, Pascal Frossard
The paper introduces Trimmed Logit-Gap SFT (TrimSFT), a token-level reweighting strategy that adjusts supervised fine-tuning loss based on the logit gap between the correct token and its strongest competitor. TrimSFT trims supervision from tokens that are either already mastered (large logit gap) or poorly supported (small or negative logit gap), focusing learning on tokens with intermediate logit gaps. Experiments on six base models across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that TrimSFT consistently outperforms standard SFT, achieving the best average performance on five of six models and up to +26.9 points on MATH500.
By Yaning Jia, Chunhui Zhang, Wenxuan Xu, Xingjian Diao, Xiaoyuan Wang, Soroush Vosoughi
arXiv:2508. 10123v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Advanced reasoning in LLMs on challenging domains like mathematical reasoning can be tackled using verifiable rewards based reinforced fine-tuning (ReFT).
By Maxime Heuillet, Yufei Cui, Boxing Chen, Audrey Durand, Prasanna Parthasarathi
arXiv:2604. 06628v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A prevailing narrative in LLM post-training holds that supervised finetuning (SFT) memorizes while reinforcement learning (RL) generalizes.
By Qihan Ren, Peng Wang, Ruikun Cai, Shuai Shao, Dadi Guo, Yuejin Xie, Yafu Li, Quanshi Zhang, Xia Hu, Jing Shao, Dongrui Liu
arXiv:2606. 11189v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) typically maximizes the likelihood of every token in a demonstrated trajectory.
By Tong Xie, Yuanhao Ban, Yunqi Hong, Sohyun An, Yihang Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh
The paper introduces Test-Time Calibration Learning (TTCL), a label‑free framework that adapts both reasoning accuracy and verbalized confidence of large language models directly on unlabeled target‑task data. TTCL generates self‑supervision signals from multiple model responses, enabling calibration without ground‑truth labels and proving theoretically as a bounded surrogate for the ideal calibration objective. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and factual question answering show consistent improvements, with base models gaining an average 40.13% in accuracy and 70.80% in ECE reduction across eight benchmarks, and further gains under domain shift.
By Zizhuo Zhang, Xiong Peng, Jingwei Sun, Rong Yao, Shixiong Kai, Mingxuan Yuan, Bo Han
arXiv:2606. 11206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is the predominant paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs), yet it suffers from optimization instability and limited generalization.
By Yucheng Zhou, Junwei Sheng, Qianning Wang, Jianbing Shen
arXiv:2606. 09932v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become a standard pipeline for Large Language Model (LLM) post-training.
By Runze Liu, Jiashun Liu, Xu Wan, Yuqian Fu, Ling Pan
arXiv:2607. 03478v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training of frontier language models is conducted on curated task suites, and inevitably leaves a distribution shift between training and deployment environments.
By Jou Barzdukas, Jack Peck, Julian Schulz, Paulius Rauba, Steven Basart, Lennie Wells
arXiv:2610.09665v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: On-policy post-training can improve large language models by learning from their own trajectories, but requires costly rollout generation. We ask wheth...
By Tianle Wang, Jiayu Liu, Ruizhi Zhao, Ning Miao
The paper introduces Predictability-Aware Canvas Selection and Supervision (PACS), a supervised fine‑tuning method for diffusion language models that aligns training with inference by using the model’s own predictability to determine which tokens are visible and when they are supervised. PACS selects the attention‑visible input length for each example and supervises reference tokens just before they become confident, addressing mismatches caused by random masking. Experiments on reasoning and code‑generation benchmarks show PACS consistently outperforms standard SFT, achieving up to 12.84 percentage‑point gains on individual tasks.
By Miao Li, Hanyang Jiang, Hengyu Fu, Baihe Huang, Yating Liu, Yuhang Cai, Changkun Guan, Zhongzhu Chen, Jiecheng Lu, Michael A. Boateng, Pascal Van Hentenryck
PG-SFT: Balancing Capability Acquisition and Retention in Offline Agent Fine-Tuning explores how to maintain a model’s existing abilities while teaching it new ones through supervised fine‑tuning on offline agent trajectories. The authors compare standard SFT, KL‑penalty, and update‑magnitude constraints, finding that these methods still degrade non‑target capabilities. They introduce Privilege‑Guided SFT (PG‑SFT), which uses turn‑level information gain to modulate supervision strength, achieving a better trade‑off between acquiring new skills and preserving existing ones, though with a slight drop in target‑task performance.
By Ronghua Li, Zi Liang, Zhishan Li, Shinan Liu