arXiv Machine Learning

FAR-DPO: Feasibility-Aware and Robust Direct Preference Optimization for Cyclic Peptide Design

arXiv:2608. 19808v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cyclic peptides are emerging as promising molecular scaffolds in drug discovery due to their high binding affinity and structural stability.

arXiv AI
Oct 31

PepEVOLVE: Position-Aware Dynamic Peptide Optimization via Group-Relative Advantage

PepEVOLVE is a dynamic, position‑aware framework for optimizing macrocyclic peptides that learns where to edit and how to improve multiple properties. It enhances pretraining with dynamic masking and CHUCKLES shifting, employs a multi‑armed‑bandit router to identify high‑reward residues, and uses an evolving optimization algorithm with group‑relative advantage to stabilize updates. In in‑silico tests on a Rev‑binding macrocycle benchmark, PepEVOLVE surpassed PepINVENT, achieving higher permeability‑weighted scores and converging faster while respecting structural constraints.

By Trieu Nguyen, Hao-Wei Pang, Shasha Feng
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Pepti-drift: Scalable Safe-Active Peptide Generation Without Inference-Time Guidance

Pepti-drift is a one‑step peptide generation framework that uses a single latent refinement and parallel decoding, avoiding costly inference‑time guidance. It incorporates attraction toward target‑specific binders and repulsion from liability‑associated regions, achieving an 18.37% predicted Safe‑Active yield across 88 held‑out targets. The method delivers competitive gains to multi‑property‑guided baselines while reducing generation cost by 468×, enabling scalable and fair high‑throughput peptide design.

By Takashi Fujiwara, Hikaru Shindo, Kaushalya Madhawa, Jun Jin Choong, Shuan Chen, Yuna Oikawa, Yiming Zhang, Gyubok Lee, Keisuke Ozawa
arXiv AI
Aug 13

A Modular Agentic Framework for Synthetically Constrained Multi-Objective Hit-to-Lead Optimization

arXiv:2608. 11483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hit-to-lead optimization requires iterative design of hit analogs across competing potency, selectivity, physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, safety, and synthetic constraints.

By Kelvin P. Idanwekhai, Enes Kelestemur, Benjamin Strickland, Matthew Hart, Steini Davidsson, Angelos Angelopoulos, Ron Alterovitz, Marcello DeLuca, Alexander Tropsha
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

PocketVE: Stable and Property-Guided Structure-Based Drug Design with Variance-Exploding Diffusion

PocketVE is a protein-pocket-conditioned variance‑exploding diffusion framework that integrates stable 3D coordinate denoising, classifier‑free property guidance, and adaptive protein perturbation. It improves 3D validity from 58.6% to 80.6% and reduces strain energy from 457.4 to 127.9 on CrossDocked2020 while maintaining competitive docking and property scores. The study shows moderate guidance balances target objectives with geometric quality, and diagnostics confirm enhanced pocket compatibility.

By Peining Zhang, Jinbo Bi
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 22

Multi-Objective Protein Optimization via Modular Diffusion Steering

The paper introduces MODS, a modular framework that performs multi‑objective protein optimization by steering diffusion models at inference time. MODS samples Chebyshev scalarization weights and a surrogate ensemble member to create a scalar steering reward, allowing the generation of sequences that balance multiple properties. After each batch of experimental evaluations, MODS updates its surrogates without retraining the generative model, and it achieves competitive hypervolume results across six protein optimization tasks, outperforming baselines on several.

By Meir Roketlishvili, Felix Huber, Wenda Chu, Yisong Yue, Raul Astudillo
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 15

PMO-Dock: Benchmarking Docking, Specificity, and Generalization in Molecular Optimization

PMO-Dock introduces a standardized benchmark for docking‑based molecular optimization, comprising 25 tasks that span hit generation, lead optimization, and a specificity task that rewards strong on‑target binding while penalizing off‑target interactions. The protocol separates model development from final evaluation, using validation tasks for hyperparameter tuning and held‑out test tasks evaluated under a strict oracle budget to mimic realistic drug‑discovery constraints. Four diverse methods—Saturn, GenMol, Genetic‑guided GFlowNet, and ChemLlama—were benchmarked, revealing no single method dominates across all tasks and highlighting limited hyperparameter transferability, which underscores the need for method‑dependent selection strategies.

By Gor Simonyan, Tatevik Abrahamyan, Narek Abelyan, Tigran Fahradyan, Hrant Khachatrian