PMO-Dock introduces a standardized benchmark for docking‑based molecular optimization, comprising 25 tasks that span hit generation, lead optimization, and a specificity task that rewards strong on‑target binding while penalizing off‑target interactions. The protocol separates model development from final evaluation, using validation tasks for hyperparameter tuning and held‑out test tasks evaluated under a strict oracle budget to mimic realistic drug‑discovery constraints. Four diverse methods—Saturn, GenMol, Genetic‑guided GFlowNet, and ChemLlama—were benchmarked, revealing no single method dominates across all tasks and highlighting limited hyperparameter transferability, which underscores the need for method‑dependent selection strategies.
arXiv:2512. 02328v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Selecting an effective docking algorithm is highly context-dependent, and no single method performs reliably across structural, chemical, and protocol regimes.
arXiv:2606. 00555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Structure-based drug design increasingly employs LLM agents to iteratively refine ligands against a target pocket, yet a viable ligand must satisfy two often-conflicting objectives -- binding affinity and druggability -- which single optimization steps rarely improve together.
The paper introduces Mol-E, an evolutionary algorithm that leverages large language models trained on molecular data to generate candidate molecules. Mol-E achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on the Practical Molecular Optimization benchmark, scoring 17.500 in the task‑agnostic regime and 20.551 in the task‑informed regime. It also outperforms baseline methods in multi‑property optimization tasks involving docking against DRD2, MK2, and AChE.
arXiv:2509. 26405v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce InVirtuoGen, a discrete flow generative model for fragmented SMILES for de novo and fragment-constrained generation, and target-property/lead optimization of small molecules.
arXiv:2609.00189v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Goal-directed optimization is essential for steering molecular generators to propose candidates with desired properties. However, it is often implement...
arXiv:2607. 12488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Molecular optimization in drug discovery, materials design, and catalysis requires searching vast chemical spaces under tight evaluation budgets, since high-fidelity oracles and experimental measurements are costly.
arXiv:2607. 02834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Molecular optimization often starts from a pretrained generative model that captures a broad prior over valid molecular structures.
arXiv:2608. 11483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hit-to-lead optimization requires iterative design of hit analogs across competing potency, selectivity, physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, safety, and synthetic constraints.
SurfSpec is a new framework for lead optimization that improves drug specificity without needing off‑target structures. It works by measuring and reducing the geometric mismatch between a ligand and its target pocket, using the triangle inequality to infer a lower bound on mismatch to off‑target pockets. In tests on the CrossDocked2020 dataset, SurfSpec lowers geometric mismatch and achieves higher empirical specificity while still improving target affinity.
arXiv:2610.23791v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computational drug discovery requires agents to compose scientific operations and adapt to changing evidence and constraints. Here we introduce DrugHar...
SpecOpt is a new molecular design task that optimizes the binding specificity of existing drugs by making constrained structural modifications. The method uses an agentic framework that docks a compound against its intended target and known off‑targets, compares residue‑aware atom‑protein contacts, and feeds the differential interactions to a large language model to propose changes. On a benchmark of 915 compounds, SpecOpt increased the target‑off‑target binding gap for 84.8% of cases while preserving drug‑like properties and structural similarity.
SurfSpec is a lead‑optimization framework that improves drug specificity without needing off‑target structures. By measuring and reducing the geometric mismatch between a ligand and its target pocket, SurfSpec provides a conservative lower bound on specificity against geometrically separated off‑target pockets. The method iteratively grows ligands toward under‑occupied target surface patches, alternating between linker generation and refinement, and demonstrates superior empirical specificity on the CrossDocked2020 test set while maintaining competitive target affinity.