arXiv AI

Synthetic Counteradaptation: A Principle of Human-AI Co-evolution

arXiv:2606. 15503v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we introduce the concept of synthetic counteradaptation, a process where human and AI systems co-evolve by adapting to each other's strategies and behaviors.

arXiv AI
Jun 18

Recursive Joint Simulation in Games

arXiv:2402. 08128v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Game-theoretic dynamics between AI agents could differ from traditional human-human interactions in various ways.

By Vojtech Kovarik, Caspar Oesterheld, Vincent Conitzer
arXiv AI
Jul 16

Social Simulations: from Agent-Based Modeling to Digital Twins

arXiv:2607. 13693v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This book chapter covers the evolution of social simulation from classical agent-based models, in which agents interact according to explicitly defined behavioral rules, to AI-enhanced simulations based on Large Language Models and, ultimately, Social Digital Twins: high-fidelity, data-driven representations of real-world socio-technical systems.

By Erica Cau, Andrea Failla, Valentina Pansanella, Giulio Rossetti
arXiv AI
Jul 17

Align AI to Dynamic Human-AI Workflows

arXiv:2607. 14240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current alignment approaches typically focus on emulating human behavior using static representations of human preferences, failing to capture the dynamic, context-dependent nature of real-world human-AI interactions.

By Valerie Chen, Cleotilde Gonzalez, Anita Williams Woolley, Michael Lee, Tongshuang Wu, Vincent Conitzer, Aarti Singh
arXiv AI
Jul 7

Serious Games: Human-AI Interaction, Evolution, and Coevolution

arXiv:2505. 16388v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The serious games between humans and AI have only just begun.

By Nandini Doreswamy (Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia, National Coalition of Independent Scholars), Louise Horstmanshof (Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia)
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

SocioVerse2: A Longitudinal Dynamic Social Simulation Framework under a Human-AI Co-evolutionary Paradigm

arXiv:2609.24911v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Social simulation offers the social sciences an experimental instrument that the real world cannot supply, and generative agents have transformed it by...

By Xinnong Zhang, Jiayu Lin, Jia Wang, Yixu Huang, Xinyi Mou, Yingqian Wu, Jingcong Liang, Shijun Lei, Jianing Shi, Guanying Li, Siyuan Wang, Hanjia Lyu, Zhenfei Yin, Yunlu Yin, Siming Chen, Yulan He, Jiebo Luo, Xuanjing Huang, Liyin Jin, Baohua Zhou, Hanqi Yan, Zhongyu Wei
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Payoff scaling shapes cooperation in LLM agents across languages

arXiv:2601. 19082v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that negotiate, coordinate, and act on behalf of users.

By Trung-Kiet Huynh, Dao-Sy Duy-Minh, Thanh-Bang Cao, Phong-Hao Le, Hong-Dan Nguyen, Phu-Quy Nguyen-Lam, Minh-Luan Nguyen-Vo, Hong-Phat Pham, Phu-Hoa Pham, Thien-Kim Than, Chi-Nguyen Tran, Huy Tran, Gia-Thoai Tran-Le, Alessio Buscemi, Le Hong Trang, The Anh Han
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Position: Behavioral Systems Require Behavioral Tests

The paper argues that artificial agentic systems, which operate as behavioral systems by interacting with dynamic environments, pursuing goals, and adapting over time, should be evaluated through systematic observation, perturbation, and interpretation of their actions rather than solely on performance outcomes. It draws on lessons from behavioral sciences to motivate this position and proposes a research agenda that includes methods for recovering decision strategies from action sequences, constructing environments that isolate behavioral differences, and probing emergent dynamics in multi‑agent systems. These directions aim to establish a rigorous science of AI behavior.

By Manuel Cherep, Nikhil Singh, Pattie Maes