The study examines whether Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models develop linguistically structured expert routing during bilingual language acquisition. Using a decoder-only English‑German MoE Transformer trained with sequential language exposure, the authors probe token‑level routing distributions and measure category‑dependent specialization via mutual information, routing entropy, and Jensen‑Shannon distance. Results show that a curriculum‑trained model peaks at a mutual information of 0.1148 at layer 5, while a no‑curriculum baseline trained on mixed data achieves a higher peak of 0.2599 at the same layer, indicating stronger aggregate specialization. Replication with a second training seed reveals that the no‑curriculum condition’s specialization focuses on a single language in a seed‑dependent way, whereas the curriculum consistently yields a stable, language‑balanced routing profile, suggesting that staged bilingual exposure reduces single‑language dominance.
By Amrit Gopinath, Raghul, Durairaj Thenmozhi
arXiv:2604.03592v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models exhibit striking performance disparities across languages, yet the internal mechanisms driving these gaps rem...
By Kening Zheng, Wei-Chieh Huang, Jiahao Huo, Zhonghao Li, Henry Peng Zou, Yibo Yan, Xin Zou, Jungang Li, Junzhuo Li, Hanrong Zhang, Xuming Hu, Philip S. Yu
The paper introduces RARE, a router‑agnostic representation engineering framework for Mixture‑of‑Experts language models. RARE projects behavioral perturbations onto the null space of the router matrix to avoid affecting routing, and corrects downstream routing drift. Experiments on six open‑weight MoE models show that RARE improves steering tasks—reducing harmfulness, increasing truthfulness, and enhancing factual editing—while preserving overall model accuracy.
By Zhibo Zhang, Zhen Ouyang, Ling Shi, Kailong Wang
arXiv:2606. 14398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-experts (MoE) layers enable the scaling of transformer models while keeping the inference compute fixed.
By Yongli Xiang, Vinoth Nandakumar, Yunzhi Yao, Peike Li, Tongliang Liu
arXiv:2608. 06396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models route each token through a small subset of experts, making routing patterns useful for identifying task-relevant experts during downstream adaptation.
By Guanzhi Deng, Haibo Wang, Kuan Wu, Xiangru Jian, Shing Yin Wong, Sichun Luo, Zhuoran Wang, Linqi Song
The paper investigates whether different latent language probes—GMM-based representation probes and decoding-based probes—measure the same phenomenon in multilingual language models. Across various model families, training regimes, domains, tasks, checkpoints, and up to 27 languages, the authors find systematic disagreement: representation probes indicate earlier cross‑lingual mixing, while decoding probes reveal sharper, English‑biased language signals. These differences correlate with model multilinguality and training progression but remain relatively stable across domains, suggesting that current probes capture distinct aspects of multilingual processing rather than a single internal lingua franca.
By Deniz Bayazit, Badr AlKhamissi, Antoine Bosselut
The paper demonstrates that large language model (LLM) evaluators, whether reward‑model based or prompted LLM‑as‑a‑Judge, exhibit significant language bias in multilingual settings. Experiments with semantically identical instruction‑response pairs across 23 languages reveal that lower‑resource languages receive higher scores, a bias that persists across eight open‑weight evaluators and is not detectable by standard pairwise accuracy metrics. The authors link the bias to model uncertainty and language identity, showing it cannot be explained by content difficulty alone.
By Ej Zhou, Lucas Resck, Zheng Hui, Anna Korhonen
Mixture-of-experts vision-language models (MoE-VLMs) increase model capacity with sparse expert activation, yet deployment requires storing the full expert pool. Training-free expert merging reduces this burden, and many routing-based methods aggregate routing statistics across all tokens to determine merge compatibility.
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models route each token to multiple experts, suggesting a geometric account of their benefit: co-selected experts should contribute distinct representation directions. Existing evidence often conflates route coherence, candidate quality, and candidate-by-context interaction.
arXiv:2608. 10939v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual short-text classification supports operational systems such as content moderation, customer support routing, and intent recognition, yet aggregate evaluation often hides large differences between high-resource and low-resource languages.
By Wajdi Ben Saad, Safa Madiouni
The study compares an English-only and a bilingual decoder-only model, each 310 M parameters, trained on eight diverse languages while controlling for English exposure, compute, and document overlap. After aligning on shared English vocabulary, the authors find that token embeddings appear similar, but the deeper hidden states used for prediction diverge across models. This hidden‑state mismatch grows through middle transformer layers and persists despite controls, indicating that contextual processing differs between the models.
"whyItMatters":"The findings show that embedding alignment can conceal significant internal representation differences, which is crucial for any downstream work that assumes aligned multilingual models are interchangeable."
By Anjishnu Mukherjee, Ziwei Zhu, Antonios Anastasopoulos
arXiv:2410. 07809v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multilingual instruction tuning (MIT) is challenged by the curse of multilinguality, data scarcity, and high computational cost.
By G\"urkan Soykan, G\"ozde G\"ul \c{S}ahin