The paper audits two single‑investigator AI‑assisted research repositories to assess how well they record provenance of AI tool use. One repository contains a prescriptive trace of rule files, with 85.6% of committed lines still visible, while the other holds a narrative trace of an agent’s scratchpad, showing only 21.8% visibility. The study finds that repository‑level indicators such as the Co‑Authored‑By trailer are inconsistent and unreliable for measuring AI involvement, and it outlines which provenance claims each trace type can support or fail to support.
By Koutian Wu, Zesen Huang, Hejia Geng
arXiv:2606. 18237v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reproducing research results from papers and released code is central to scientific progress.
By Shanda Li, Qiuhong Anna Wei, Jingwu Tang, Valerie Chen, Nihar B Shah, Tim Dettmers, Yiming Yang, Ameet Talwalkar
The paper introduces an author‑in‑the‑loop collaborative audit system for reproducibility checks during peer review, where authors explicitly declare reproduction instructions via a structured checklist. An AI agent uses these declarations to investigate and assess reproducibility, while human reviewers approve requests and decide on issue resolution. The system was deployed on 36 conference papers, identifying 20 issues that were subsequently resolved, and the study examined how different checklist conditions affected the agent’s assessment.
By Yukun Dong, Linjun Zhang, Tian Zheng
arXiv:2610.39468v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: AI coding agents now do long, multi-step and multi-session software work with little supervision. When a developer comes back to that work, the usefu...
By Mohammed Nayeem Khan, K S Sarun Kumar
arXiv:2606. 10241v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous improvement loops are hard to trust because the improvement process is usually external scaffolding bolted onto the agent: failures go unlogged, diagnoses cannot be replayed, and promote-or-discard decisions land in a side database rather than the agent's own history.
By Yohei Nakajima
arXiv:2608. 05179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used across the scientific research lifecycle: ideation, literature search, experiment design and execution, analysis, manuscript drafting, and review.
By Tianyu Ding, Aditya Nannapaneni, Bingfan Liu, Ling Zhang
The paper introduces BenchGuard, a framework that uses advanced language models to audit execution-based agent benchmarks. BenchGuard systematically cross-verifies benchmark artifacts through structured LLM protocols, optionally incorporating agent solutions or execution traces for deeper diagnostics. In tests on ScienceAgentBench and BIXBench Verified-50, BenchGuard uncovered numerous author-confirmed and expert-identified issues, including fatal errors that made tasks unsolvable, and demonstrated cost-effective auditing for complex bioinformatics tasks.
By Xinming Tu (Minta), Tianze Wang (Minta), Yingzhou (Minta), Lu, Kexin Huang, Yuanhao Qu, Sara Mostafavi
The paper introduces inexpensive, scalable methods for evaluating language model behavior across different vendors and releases. By running identical public stimuli on a cross‑vendor panel and analyzing transcripts via exact match, LLM‑coded codebooks, or instrumented environments, the authors can quantify model responses at a cost of a few dollars per model. Applying these tools to four years of releases reveals patterns of convergence, resistance, positional stability, and compliance that vary by generation, lab, and harness.
By Tapan Parikh
K‑Dense BYOK is a free, open‑source AI research assistant that runs locally on a researcher’s own computer. It provides a structured environment with scientific procedures, workflow templates, and a living lab notebook that logs all actions without allowing the agent to alter the record. The system emphasizes reproducibility by recording the software environment and offering commands to regenerate results, outperforming managed platforms on interdisciplinary research prompts.
By Aubrey M. Brueckner, Darshil Patel, Yuhuan He, Timothy Kassis
arXiv:2608. 05204v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-agent ecosystems are rapidly growing around reusable skills: mixed-modality packages of metadata, natural-language instructions, code, tools, references, and operational workflows.
By Jialuo Chen, Minghe Wang, Lingqi Jiang, Jianan Ma, Xinhao Deng, Xiaohu Du, Ruixiao Lin, Yunhao Feng, Linkang Du, Jingyi Wang
arXiv:2609.10293v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In high-stakes domains such as legal practice, a language-model answer is only useful to the extent that a reader can verify each claim against the sou...
By Chen Qian, Yimeng Wang, Yu Chen, Lingfei Wu, Andreas Stathopoulos
arXiv:2607. 20527v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic LLM systems such as OpenScholar and PaperQA2 read the scientific literature and return cited answers, and both they and their benchmarks already check whether those citations hold, with a fixed attribution model or human graders.
By Taewan Goo, Junsik Kim, Kyulhee Han, GwonYul Jo, Jong-Soo Kim, Tae-Hyung Kim