arXiv:2606. 08365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are increasingly used to steer language models, but feature steering is rarely clean: the same intervention can behave inconsistently across contexts and perturb unrelated features.
By Evan Duan
arXiv:2610.16325v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: When a steering intervention changes a language model's behavior, which part of the intervention deserves the credit? We test this question for a targe...
By Shuhul Razdan, R Balamurugan
arXiv:2606. 18322v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) decompose residual-stream activations into interpretable features.
By Mingyue Cui, Linghui Shen, Xingyi Yang
arXiv:2607. 10226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We evaluate when sparse autoencoder (SAE) features act as localized control handles for safety-relevant behavior.
By Daming Luo
The paper introduces a controlled benchmark for deciding whether to acquire a third modality or abstain when audio, video, and text scores conflict. A threshold policy that observes two signed scores can request the third at a cost and abstain, achieving higher targeted decision accuracy and utility than always-answer fusion under certain reward settings. Experiments on synthetic and real data show that the policy’s advantage depends on the ambiguity mechanism, budget constraints, and the ranking of observed pairs, highlighting the trade‑off between full-modality accuracy and pre‑request selection value.
By Mengzhe Geng
arXiv:2608. 09490v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Task arithmetic treats fine-tuning displacements as composable directions in weight space, yet it remains unclear when parameter addition reflects predictable changes in model function.
By Chencheng Zhu, Xiaoyang Li, Taotao Cai
arXiv:2607.12176v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) undermine digital behaviour-change interventions, and recognizing them automatically from video is the goal of the...
By Josep Cabacas-Maso, Ismael Benito-Altamirano, Carles Ventura
The study investigates why large language models (LLMs) show different triage performance when answering clinician‑authored vignettes in multiple‑choice versus free‑text formats. Using sparse‑autoencoder features on Gemma 3 and Qwen3 models, the authors find that medical information is encoded similarly in both formats, but at the decision token the multiple‑choice scaffold dominates, with over 91% of attribution coming from scaffold‑peaking features. The effect varies by model, and shuffling option order eliminates simple positional bias, suggesting the format influence is tied to answer selection rather than earlier case processing.
By David Fraile Navarro, Berardino Como, Jialei Sheng, Soundariya Ananthan, Shlomo Berkovsky
arXiv:2610.22640v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Model-editing backdoors aim to induce harmful responses under a trigger while preserving ordinary behavior on untriggered input. Recent model-editing a...
By Yutong Ke, Yansu Wang, Zeyu Zhang, Xihao Guo, Chongwen Zhao, Kaizhu Huang
arXiv:2609.13709v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Human corrections identify editable spans, but the examples receiving corrections may come from a selective feedback channel. We analyze this interacti...
By Shengwei Zhang, Haoda Dai, Yifei Li, Yuheng Song
arXiv:2610.18462v2 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Readout scaling changes what a sparse autoencoder (SAE) learns, but the benefit of removing it depends on the data. We use readout-canonicalized deci...
By Brian Xiao, Sarah Wilson
arXiv:2607. 19364v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Activation steering adds a residual-stream direction at inference time, providing lightweight behavioral control without fine-tuning.
By Oshayer Siddique, J. M Areeb Uzair Alam, Md Jobayer Rahman Rafy, Syed Rifat Raiyan, Hasan Mahmud, Md Kamrul Hasan