arXiv Computation and Language

Made in Hungary: Comments on the performance of generative language models

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

M-GATE: Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 03803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task _in_ a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Burkert, Angelika Peljak-{\L}api\'nska, David Zelen\'y
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 8

sk-bench: A Native-First Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Slovak

arXiv:2610.09152v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multilingual LLM benchmarks omit Slovak, a morphologically rich West Slavic language of five million speakers, or cover it only by machine translation....

By Marek \v{S}uppa, Ivan Vykopal, Andrej Ridzik, Kristi\'an Sopkovi\v{c}, Nat\'alia K\v{n}a\v{z}ekov\'a, Jaroslav Kop\v{c}an, Miroslav Bl\v{s}t\'ak, Vikt\'oria Ondrejov\'a, Daniel Hl\'adek, Michal Gregor, Martin Tamajka, Mari\'an \v{S}imko
arXiv AI
Oct 1

NinaXander: Feasibility and Limits of Composing Frozen Language Models Across Architecture Families via a Shared Latent Space

The paper introduces NinaXander, a method for composing frozen language models from different architecture families by inserting a trained shared‑latent adapter between their layers. By running the initial layers of one model, converting the intermediate representation with the adapter, and then continuing with the remaining layers of another model, multiple composed models can be created without retraining. Experiments with RWKV and Pythia show that while some compositions preserve syntactic quality and reduce memory usage, none match the parent model’s accuracy and language‑modeling performance drops on out‑of‑domain data.

By Takanori Kotama, Shun-ichiro Hayashi, Daichi Mukunoki, Tetsuya Hoshino, Takahiro Katagiri
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

From prompting to evidence-based translation: A RAG+prompt system for Japanese-Chinese translation and its pedagogical potential

The paper presents a retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) system combined with prompt engineering for Japanese‑to‑Chinese translation, focusing on sentences with noun‑modifying clause constructions (NMCCs). It integrates linguistic analysis, embedding‑based retrieval, and prompt construction before generating translations with GPT‑4o, without altering the base model. Experiments on a 66‑sentence test set show that increasing the knowledge‑base size from 0 to 2,000 examples raises macro‑averaged BLEU scores from 24.28 to 29.96, indicating improved translation quality for NMCC‑rich sentences.

By Wenshi Gu
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

LuxIT: A Luxembourgish Instruction Tuning Dataset from Monolingual Seed Data

LuxIT is a monolingual instruction‑tuning dataset for Luxembourgish, created by synthesizing instruction‑answer pairs from native texts using the DeepSeek‑R1‑0528 model and a quality‑assurance LLM‑as‑judge process. The resulting 227,507 high‑quality pairs were used to fine‑tune 14 LLMs (≤15 B parameters), yielding an average accuracy increase of +5.37 percentage points on standardized Luxembourgish proficiency exams and improvements in macro‑averaged F1 on nine of the fourteen downstream NLP tasks. These findings demonstrate that synthetic monolingual data can effectively enhance LLM performance in low‑resource languages and reveal the complex relationship between exam performance and practical NLP gains.

By Julian Valline, Cedric Lothritz, Siwen Guo, Jordi Cabot
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

TatBLiMP: A Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Tatar

TatBLiMP is the first benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs for the Tatar language, covering 16 morphosyntactic phenomena across 1,248 sentence pairs that differ by a single morpheme. Each pair contains one grammatical and one ungrammatical sentence, with the ungrammatical version generated by a deterministic perturbation and ratified by a native speaker. The benchmark evaluates models by comparing their assigned probabilities, allowing assessment without text generation or parsing, and tracks performance across from-scratch, cross‑lingual, and multilingual large language models.

By Ilshat Saetov, Dmitry Gaynullin
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 12

How Robust Are LLMs to Vietnamese Dialects?

arXiv:2608. 10414v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically evaluated on standard written Vietnamese, yet everyday communication frequently involves regional dialects that preserve meaning but differ in surface form.

By Minh Tran, Trinh Chau, Thanh-Nhan Le, Nam Tran, Luan Thanh Nguyen, Cuong Dang, Duc Hoang