arXiv Computation and Language

Made in Hungary: Comments on the performance of generative language models

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

M-GATE: Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 03803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task _in_ a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Burkert, Angelika Peljak-{\L}api\'nska, David Zelen\'y
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

LuxIT: A Luxembourgish Instruction Tuning Dataset from Monolingual Seed Data

LuxIT is a monolingual instruction‑tuning dataset for Luxembourgish, created by synthesizing instruction‑answer pairs from native texts using the DeepSeek‑R1‑0528 model and a quality‑assurance LLM‑as‑judge process. The resulting 227,507 high‑quality pairs were used to fine‑tune 14 LLMs (≤15 B parameters), yielding an average accuracy increase of +5.37 percentage points on standardized Luxembourgish proficiency exams and improvements in macro‑averaged F1 on nine of the fourteen downstream NLP tasks. These findings demonstrate that synthetic monolingual data can effectively enhance LLM performance in low‑resource languages and reveal the complex relationship between exam performance and practical NLP gains.

By Julian Valline, Cedric Lothritz, Siwen Guo, Jordi Cabot
arXiv Computation and Language
4d ago

TatBLiMP: A Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Tatar

TatBLiMP is the first benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs for the Tatar language, covering 16 morphosyntactic phenomena across 1,248 sentence pairs that differ by a single morpheme. Each pair contains one grammatical and one ungrammatical sentence, with the ungrammatical version generated by a deterministic perturbation and ratified by a native speaker. The benchmark evaluates models by comparing their assigned probabilities, allowing assessment without text generation or parsing, and tracks performance across from-scratch, cross‑lingual, and multilingual large language models.

By Ilshat Saetov, Dmitry Gaynullin
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 12

How Robust Are LLMs to Vietnamese Dialects?

arXiv:2608. 10414v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically evaluated on standard written Vietnamese, yet everyday communication frequently involves regional dialects that preserve meaning but differ in surface form.

By Minh Tran, Trinh Chau, Thanh-Nhan Le, Nam Tran, Luan Thanh Nguyen, Cuong Dang, Duc Hoang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

From Zero to Hero: An Open LLM Ecosystem for Armenian

The paper introduces the first open Armenian large language model, arm‑gemma‑e4b, trained on two newly released datasets: ArmWeb, a 4.37 million‑document news corpus, and ArmSTEM, a 373 k English‑Armenian math and science problem set with verified step‑by‑step solutions. Continued pretraining of Gemma‑4‑E4B on these datasets outperforms all existing open Armenian models and demonstrates that adding a small portion of verified translated STEM data can restore knowledge lost during news‑only pretraining. The authors also reveal significant overlap between major public Armenian corpora and web‑derived evaluation panels, and they provide all data, models, and code openly.

By Erik Arakelyan, Khatun Avetisyan, Meri Davtyan, Heghine Grigoryan, Nane Khachatryan, Hayk Shahsuvaryan, Henrik Sergoyan, Vahan Martirosyan
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

A Factorial Study of Synthetic Data Generation for Low-Resource Machine Translation using Grammar Books

The paper presents a pipeline that leverages large language models to extract grammatical rules, example sentences, and lexicons from descriptive grammar books, producing synthetic parallel corpora for fine‑tuning machine translation models. Evaluated on three low‑resource languages—Kalamang, Tuatschin, and Mandan—the synthetic data improves translation quality over seed‑data baselines in 75% of configurations for Kalamang and 59% for Tuatschin, achieving up to +8.8 ChrF++ gains. A factorial study across 96 configurations identifies which combinations of target part‑of‑speech, retrieval granularity, and sample volume drive performance gains and where they fail, demonstrating that static linguistic documentation can be repurposed for practical translation tools for severely under‑resourced languages.

By Varun Ghat Ravikumar, Sina Ahmadi, Lena J\"ager, Rico Sennrich