arXiv AI
Statistical Machine Translation Systems of English-Pnar Language Pair : Some Insights of the Emperical Study
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 25
Towards a resource for multilingual lexicons: an MT assisted and human-in-the-loop multilingual parallel corpus with multi-word expression annotation
arXiv:2011.03783v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In this work, we introduce the construction of a machine translation (MT) assisted and human-in-the-loop multilingual parallel corpus with an...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2
Unified Multi-Dialectal Neural Machine Translation for Bangla Using the Dwadash Benchmark Corpus
arXiv:2608.12018v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural Machine Translation (NMT) and Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at cross-lingual tasks but often fail to capture intra-lingual morphologica...
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5
M-GATE: Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency Benchmark for Large Language Models
arXiv:2608. 03803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task _in_ a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11
A Factorial Study of Synthetic Data Generation for Low-Resource Machine Translation using Grammar Books
The paper presents a pipeline that leverages large language models to extract grammatical rules, example sentences, and lexicons from descriptive grammar books, producing synthetic parallel corpora for fine‑tuning machine translation models. Evaluated on three low‑resource languages—Kalamang, Tuatschin, and Mandan—the synthetic data improves translation quality over seed‑data baselines in 75% of configurations for Kalamang and 59% for Tuatschin, achieving up to +8.8 ChrF++ gains. A factorial study across 96 configurations identifies which combinations of target part‑of‑speech, retrieval granularity, and sample volume drive performance gains and where they fail, demonstrating that static linguistic documentation can be repurposed for practical translation tools for severely under‑resourced languages.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25
Benchmarking Arabic--Russian Machine Translation: A Comparison of Fine-tuned NMT and Few-shot LLMs under Rich Morphology and Low Lexical Overlap
The study evaluates Arabic–Russian machine translation by comparing seven fine‑tuned neural machine translation (NMT) models with four few‑shot large language models (LLMs) on a new 15.47 million‑pair corpus split into 20k/5k/5k. Fine‑tuned NLLB‑1.3B achieves the best performance (BLEU 16.3, COMET 0.738), while the best few‑shot LLM, Aya‑Expanse 8B, scores only BLEU 1.7 on 500 sentences. Error analysis shows that low lexical overlap between Arabic and Russian is the main source of failures, and statistical tests confirm significant performance gaps between most models.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25
COILD: An Indic-Centric Parallel Corpus and Benchmark for Machine Translation Across Indian Languages
COILD is an Indic‑centric parallel corpus that contains over 1.16 million human‑translated and verified sentence pairs across 20 Indian language pairs from four language families. The corpus is sourced from original Indian language materials in eight domains, and a 2,000‑sentence domain‑centric benchmark is provided for consistent multilingual evaluation. Experiments with IndicTrans2‑Distilled and NLLB‑200 show consistent improvements in automatic metrics and human judgments, underscoring the value of high‑quality Indic‑centric data.