arXiv Machine Learning By Minh Tran, Trinh Chau, Thanh-Nhan Le, Nam Tran, Luan Thanh Nguyen, Cuong Dang, Duc Hoang

How Robust Are LLMs to Vietnamese Dialects?

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 10414v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically evaluated on standard written Vietnamese, yet everyday communication frequently involves regional dialects that preserve meaning but differ in surface form.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

VietPrism: A large-scale Vietnamese speech and deepfake corpus with diverse dialects and code-switching

VietPrism is a newly released, large‑scale Vietnamese speech corpus that combines 993.4 hours of real utterances from 1,262 verified speakers with 3.1 k hours of synthetic spoof speech. It uniquely offers transcripts, consistent speaker identities, five dialect groups, and extensive Vietnamese‑English code‑switching—nearly half of the corpus—while pairing each spoof with a matched bona fide utterance. The dataset enables controlled evaluation of deep‑fake detection models, revealing significant variability in detector performance across dialects and speaker similarity.

By Minh Hoang, Thai Le
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

Cross-Dialect NER for Bangla Regional Dialects Using Leave-One-Dialect-Out Cross-Validation and Explainable AI

The paper introduces a cross-dialect Named Entity Recognition (NER) framework for Bangla, leveraging the ANCHOLIK-NER dataset that covers five major regional dialects. Using a Leave-One-Dialect-Out Cross-Validation strategy, eight transformer-based models were evaluated, with Multilingual-E5 Large achieving the best performance (F1 up to 97.26% on Mymensingh, 82.38% on Chattogram). Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) revealed that the models rely mainly on the surface form of entity words rather than surrounding context, suggesting a direction for future improvement.

By Shamim Rahim Refat, Faika Fairuj Preotee, Shuvashis Sarker, Shifat Islam, Bidyarthi Paul, Mohammad Ashraful Hoque
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

The Dialect Tax: Dialectal Biases Persist throughout the Language Modeling Pipeline

The study investigates why language models exhibit systematic performance gaps across English dialects, a phenomenon termed the "dialect tax." Using parallel dialect corpora that preserve meaning while altering surface form, the authors confirm that models treat Standard American English and dialectal texts as semantically equivalent, yet find representational disparities that persist through tokenization, pre‑training, post‑training, and inference. Even a character‑level tokenizer does not eliminate input/output asymmetries or accuracy gaps, and dialect pairs produce more divergent gradient updates than unrelated Standard texts, indicating that dialectal content is harder for models to learn.

By Elle
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

Encoded but Not Decoded: Layer-Localized Evidence for a Three-Level Gap in LLM Syntax

The paper introduces a three-level evaluation framework—behavioral deployment, LM-head readout, and probe recoverability—to distinguish whether a language model fails a syntactic test by not encoding structure or by failing to use it. Using a trilingual control-dependency benchmark, the authors find that probe recoverability consistently exceeds LM-head readout, which in turn exceeds behavioral deployment across seven models and three languages, with the largest gap observed in Qwen3-0.6B Instruct. Layer-localized activation patching shows that instruction tuning shifts the decoded layer later, suggesting decoding favors surface shortcuts and that behavioral evaluation understates what models encode while probing alone overstates what they deploy.

By Zhenyan Lu, He Wang, Xiaohui Huang