arXiv:2505. 02722v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities across general domains, their effectiveness in real-world clinical practice remains limited.
By Junu Kim, Chaeeun Shim, Sungjin Park, Su Yeon Lee, Gee Young Suh, Chae-Man Lim, Seong Jin Choi, Song Mi Moon, Kyoung-Ho Song, Eu Suk Kim, Hong Bin Kim, Sejoong Kim, Chami Im, Dong-Wan Kang, Yong Soo Kim, Hee-Joon Bae, Sung Yoon Lim, Han-Gil Jeong, Edward Choi
arXiv:2607. 07761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as important tools in healthcare, showing growing potential for clinical reasoning and patient care.
By Qi Peng, Jiatong Li, Sirui Huang, Yiyang Jiang, Kaisong Gong, Ronger Ding, Shijie Ye, Changmeng Zheng, Yi Cai, Xiaobo Yang, Jin Huang, Xiao-Yong Wei, Qing Li
arXiv:2608.21948v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Complex clinical reasoning requires models to update diagnostic hypotheses as new evidence emerges and to coordinate different medical specialities und...
By Sike Xiang, Shuang Chen, Qian sun, Jia Cheng, Yusi Wei, Amir Atapour-Abarghouei
arXiv:2608.20887v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Automatic Medical Coding (AMC), which assigns standardized International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to clinical notes, is essential for m...
By Xubin Chen, Yipeng Zhou, Wen Sun, Chengkai Huang, Xiaoming Fu, Quan Z. Sheng
The paper introduces CARing, a framework that improves next‑visit diagnosis prediction by representing diagnoses with compositional Semantic IDs (SIDs) and optimizing multi‑label coverage through reinforcement learning. CARing encodes ontology‑enriched disease semantics into compact SIDs, aligns them with natural language and EHR contexts, and employs a coverage reward to encourage diverse diagnosis predictions. On MIMIC‑III and MIMIC‑IV datasets, CARing outperforms all EHR‑trained baselines in weighted F1 and achieves the highest top‑k recall, including R@30 scores above 46% in reasoning mode.
By Kaisong Zhang, Haotian Fang, Junmeng Zhou, Hang Lv, Yulan Pan, Yanchao Tan
arXiv:2609.24480v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in healthcare requires robust performance across two complementary dimensions - diagnostic reasoning: the conv...
By Kalash Shah, Kunal Singh, Snehan J, Shreyas Singh
arXiv:2510. 17532v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting cancer treatment outcomes requires models that are both accurate and interpretable, particularly in the presence of heterogeneous clinical data.
By Raghu Vamshi Hemadri, Geetha Krishna Guruju, Kristi Topollai, Anna Ewa Choromanska
arXiv:2604. 06684v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Clinical reasoning over electronic health records (EHRs) is a fundamental yet challenging task in modern healthcare.
By Yue Fang, Weibin Liao, Yuxin Guo, Jiaran Gao, Hongxin Ding, Jinyang Zhang, Xinke Jiang, Zhibang Yang, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang, Liantao Ma
arXiv:2603. 03292v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit high reasoning capacity in medical question-answering, but their tendency to produce hallucinations and outdated knowledge poses critical risks in healthcare fields.
By Wenhao Wu, Zhentao Tang, Yafu Li, Shixiong Kai, Mingxuan Yuan, Zhenhong Sun, Chunlin Chen, Zhi Wang
arXiv:2607. 02983v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent reasoning-centric Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides, yet they predominantly operate on a passive-inference pattern that assumes complete information.
By Shengyi Hua, Kangzhe Hu, Conghui He, Xiaofan Zhang, Shaoting Zhang
arXiv:2505. 14107v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The emergence of groundbreaking large language models capable of performing complex reasoning tasks holds significant promise for addressing various scientific challenges, including those arising in complex clinical scenarios.
By Yakun Zhu, Zhongzhen Huang, Linjie Mu, Yutong Huang, Wei Nie, Jiaji Liu, Shaoting Zhang, Pengfei Liu, Xiaofan Zhang
The paper introduces BAR, a Budget‑Aware LLM Reasoning framework that enhances post‑discharge risk prediction by integrating external medical knowledge graphs (KGs). BAR refines KGs into disease‑specific evidence graphs with support scores and provenance, then uses an LLM to plan, navigate, and verify evidence within a patient‑specific budget. Experiments on MIMIC‑III and MIMIC‑IV across eight diseases show BAR improves AUPRC by 3.4 points, raises citation precision from 59.8% to 77.9%, and uses only 62‑65% of the allotted budget.
By Chen Chen, Dongjie Wang, Mei Liu, Zijun Yao