arXiv AI By Junu Kim, Chaeeun Shim, Sungjin Park, Su Yeon Lee, Gee Young Suh, Chae-Man Lim, Seong Jin Choi, Song Mi Moon, Kyoung-Ho Song, Eu Suk Kim, Hong Bin Kim, Sejoong Kim, Chami Im, Dong-Wan Kang, Yong Soo Kim, Hee-Joon Bae, Sung Yoon Lim, Han-Gil Jeong, Edward Choi

Enhancing LLMs' Clinical Reasoning with Real-World Data from a Nationwide Sepsis Registry

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2505. 02722v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities across general domains, their effectiveness in real-world clinical practice remains limited.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

Teaching LLMs How ICU Physicians Approach Clinical Reasoning Through OMOP-Aligned Retrieval Improves Reasoning Across Clinical Domains

arXiv:2608.22622v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clinical decision-making relies on identifying relevant patient information to guide diagnosis and treatment, a challenge that is especially difficul...

By Miguel Contreras, Scott Siegel, Subhash Nerella, Jessica Sena, Jiaqing Zhang, Heng Sun, Hruday Tej Akkaladevi, Peiyu Lu, Jordan Rosen, Sumit Kapoor, Sasank Desaraju, Grace R. Thompson, Jacob Purcell, Michael Petrauskis, Philip KW. Hong, Meghan Brennan, Sarah Chrabaszcz, Tierra Smith, Ronnie Ren, Michel S. Kabbash, Ceyhun Haziroglu, Rushi Patel, Gabriel Gomez, Charlotte Chaiklin, Randy Leung, Kenneth N. John, Whitman Wiggins, Philip Kayser, Vincent Bird, Maria Bruzzone, Tyler J. Loftus, Azra Bihorac, Parisa Rashidi
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications

The paper reviews how Large Language Models (LLMs) are being adapted for medical reasoning, moving beyond single-step answers to systems that can systematically, transparently, and verifiably reason. It introduces a taxonomy of enhancement techniques, split into training-time methods such as supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning, and test-time methods like prompt engineering and multi‑agent systems. The review examines their application across text, image, and code modalities in key clinical areas—diagnosis, education, and treatment planning—and tracks the shift in evaluation benchmarks from simple accuracy to more nuanced assessments of reasoning quality and visual interpretability.

By Zizhan Ma, Wenxuan Wang, Meidan Ding, Shiyi Zheng, Shengyuan Liu, Jie Liu, Jiaming Ji, Linlin Shen, Yixuan Yuan, Wenting Chen
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

CARE: Privacy-Compliant Agentic Reasoning with Evidence Discordance

The paper introduces MIMIC-DOS, a dataset derived from MIMIC-IV that focuses on ICU cases where patient symptoms and medical signs are discordant. It presents CARE, a privacy‑compliant multi‑stage agentic reasoning framework that uses a proprietary LLM to generate structured categories and transitions, while a local LLM performs evidence acquisition and decision‑making. In retrospective evaluations on MIMIC‑DOS, CARE outperforms other LLMs and agentic workflows, demonstrating stronger handling of conflicting clinical evidence while preserving patient privacy.

By Haochen Liu, Weien Li, Rui Song, Zeyu Li, Chun Jason Xue, Xiao-Yang Liu, Sam Nallaperuma-Herzberg, Xue Liu, Ye Yuan