The paper introduces Harness-Aware Distillation (HAD), a method for training smaller language model agents that preserves the surrounding harness—software managing context, tools, and feedback—while focusing distillation on the teacher’s contributions beyond the harness. HAD combines an action preference that contrasts teacher actions with and without harness information, and a validity check that filters out contradictory preference pairs. Experiments on long-horizon agent benchmarks show that HAD outperforms standard on‑policy distillation, reducing unproductive loops and improving error recovery without requiring task rewards or future information.
By Moonseok Choi, Taehong Moon, Giung Nam, Juho Lee
arXiv:2607. 26246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD), which aligns a student with the teacher's token-level distribution on the student's own rollouts, is an effective paradigm for transferring capabilities across LLMs.
By Fangxu Yu, Zinan Lin, Xiaodong Liu, Weijia Xu, Michael Xu, Tianyi Zhou, Jianfeng Gao
arXiv:2605.10889v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: On-policy distillation offers dense, per-token supervision for training reasoning models; however, it remains unclear under which conditions...
By Mohammadreza Armandpour, Fatih Ilhan, David Harrison, Ajay Jaiswal, Duc N. M Hoang, Fartash Faghri, Yizhe Zhang, Minsik Cho, Mehrdad Farajtabar
The paper investigates whether subliminal learning (SL) can transfer a broader set of traits beyond simple preferences, such as complex capabilities, backdoors, and hacking tendencies. Experiments show that SL can indeed impart a student model with the ability to predict outputs of a random MLP, partially embed a backdoor that triggers French responses to female names, and increase hacking success in a chess environment. The effectiveness of transfer varies with the distillation method, being enhanced by logit distillation or limiting LoRA to attention layers.
By Jan Dubi\'nski, Anna Sztyber-Betley, Jan Betley, Owain Evans
arXiv:2607. 09692v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model distillation -- training on outputs from stronger third-party models -- is widely used to boost performance, but raises concerns about unfair advantages and policy violations.
By Rajat Rawat, Sizhe Chen, Akshay Anand, Michael Duan, Bob Rotsted, Sewon Min
arXiv:2607. 02502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a practical method for training large language models (LLMs) to reason, where a single model acts as both the teacher and the student with different levels of information access.
By Yunhe Li, Hao Shi, Wenhao Liu, Mengzhe Ruan, Hanxu Hou, Zhongxiang Dai, Shuang Qiu, Linqi Song
The paper investigates how on-policy self‑distillation can alter a model’s behavior by conditioning on privileged information. It contrasts attractive self‑distillation, which pulls a model toward a privileged teacher, with repulsive self‑distillation, which pushes it away, showing that attraction reduces exploratory reasoning while repulsion lengthens responses and can destabilize the model. The authors propose a contrastive self‑distillation objective that combines attraction to a correct‑solution teacher with repulsion from an incorrect‑solution teacher, finding that this approach improves reasoning performance across various model types while keeping response lengths stable.
By Anton Baumann, Akmal Ashirmatov, Leo Schmidt-Traub, Frederike L\"ubeck, Jonas H\"ubotter, Thomas Kleine Buening, Andreas Krause
The paper investigates whether on‑policy distillation (OPD) is always advantageous for transferring knowledge from a teacher to a student model. It introduces Semi‑OPD, which uses offline rollouts from the initial student, and demonstrates that across 17 teacher‑student pairs (1.5B–235B parameters) Semi‑OPD outperforms OPD in 14 cases, achieving up to +13.6% accuracy and an 11.4× speedup. The authors show that the benefit of OPD depends on the alignment between teacher and student, measured by an output‑token overlap ratio, and argue that effective distillation requires on‑policy behavior relative to both models.
By Siyan Zhao, Yonggan Fu, Jindong Jiang, Shih-Yang Liu, Song Bian, Byung-Kwan Lee, Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Wenliang Dai, Hanrong Ye, Aditya Grover, Pavlo Molchanov
arXiv:2606. 12171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Knowledge Distillation (KD) and mixup have proven effective at inducing smoothness in class boundaries; KD captures inherent class relationships in probability distributions, and mixup enforces them through convex combinations of inputs.
By Jos\'e Medina, Paul Honeine, Abdelaziz Bensrhair, Amnir Hadachi
The paper investigates how scaling the amount of model-generated, off‑task distillation data affects the recoverability of teacher‑induced traits in student models. In a controlled subliminal‑learning setup, teachers are prompted to express a target trait, producing restricted data such as number‑only completions. Students trained on larger independent datasets show a clearer manifestation of the teacher’s trait in a separate evaluation domain, with the effect being strongest when the trait is already favored or when alternative traits are present. The authors find this trend holds across model families, trait types, multi‑trait settings, and cross‑model transfer, and suggest that scaling should be coupled with trait‑aware curation and evaluation.
By Zhichen Dong, Zhixuan Liu, Yuyu Fan, Xiangtian Li, Shuyang Zhang, Chao Yang
arXiv:2609.22566v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Knowledge distillation (KD) aims to compress high-performance teacher LLMs into lightweight students. However, distilled students often exhibit subst...
By Dileesha Kannangara, Sanghamitra Dutta
arXiv:2609.36734v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Knowledge Distillation (KD) trains a smaller-capacity student model to imitate a larger-capacity teacher model by matching output distributions, implic...
By Ayan Sengupta, Vaibhav Seth, Tanmoy Chakraborty